Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kappa Kappa Gamma Foundation

Investing in our members by funding programs that fulfill the evolving needs of women.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$20M
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $1,307,736 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,885,606 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,577,870 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $159k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$159,236
Median grant
4
States reached
$67M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY$1,106,574
BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA$159,236
THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA$26,926
DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GAMMA ZETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $123k → 15%Beta Xi House Corporation: $3.0M → 10%Epsilon Alpha House Corporation: $101k → 11%DELTA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION: $151k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $2.2M → 16%Gamma Nu House Corporation: $656k → 14%GAMMA NU EDUCATIONAL AREA: $161k → 17%THETA EDUCATIONAL GRANT: $500k → 17%EPSILON BETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $156k → 7%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $757k → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $491k → 19%BETA CHI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $373k → 15%BETA XI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $544k → 10%EPSILON ALPHA HOUSE CORPORATION: $68k → 11%Delta Psi House Corporation: $52k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $371k → 16%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $377k → 17%EPSILON BETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $75k → 7%Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity: $727k → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $265k → 19%BETA CHI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $75k → 15%BETA XI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $393k → 10%EPSILON ALPHA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $51k → 11%DELTA PSI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $47k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $300k → 16%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $152k → 17%EPSILON BETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $49k → 7%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $1.3M → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $235k → 19%BETA CHI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $25k → 15%DELTA PSI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $39k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $194k → 16%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $136k → 17%EPSILON BETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $35k → 7%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $1.3M → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $181k → 19%DELTA PSI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $37k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $168k → 16%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $77k → 17%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $1.1M → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $42k → 19%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $27k → 17%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $1.0M → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $15k → 19%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $936k → 15%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $728k → 15%BETA NU HOUSE CORPORATION: $118k → 15%Beta Nu House Corporation: $98k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

OH
CO
MO
KY
AZ
AR
SC
OK
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 10 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$18M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KK
    KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +37%
  • BX
    Beta Xi House Corporation of Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity
    2× · 2017–2022 · $3.4M · revenue +37%
  • BT
    BETA THETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +31% · 99% of their budget

Funded once

  • GN
    GAMMA NU HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA
    one grant, 2017 · $656k · revenue +20% · 32% of their budget
  • BX
    BETA XI EDUCATIONAL AREA
    one grant, 2020 · $544k
  • KK
    KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gamma Tau Chapter Housing Corp

Lease real estate to gamma tau chapter of kappa alpha order

2
Eta Kappa House Corporation of Delta Gamma Fratern

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Recreation & Sports
3
Gamma Theta Incorporated

Provide housing for undergraduate chapter of national collegiate fraternity and facilitate between alumni and undergraduate members.

4
Alpha Kappa of Alpha Chi Omega Alumni Holding Association

Collegiate sorority housing

5
Delta Tau Delta Association of Columbia Mo

A house corporation that owns the delta tau delta fraternity house at the the university of missouri - columbia. the mission is to provide housing for the gamma kappa chapter of the delta tau delta fraternity.

6
Delta Gamma House Corporation

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Membership Benefit
7
Sigma Tau of Kappa Delta Housing Associa

Provide Chapter House for Students

8
Alpha Psi House Corporation of Delta Gamma Inc

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

9
Beta Omega House Corporation of Delta Gamma Frater

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

10
Kappa Delta House Corporation

Provide safe and enjoyable housing for the social sorority resident and chapter members and foster leadership skills and social graces in members.

11
Gamma Xi House Corporation of Delta Gamma Inc

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

12
Eta Gamma House Corporation of Delta Gamma Fratern

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epsilon Beta House Association of Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity and the most unlike its peers is Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY — $7,890,674 · OtherKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITYBeta Xi House Corporation of Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity — $3,419,995 · OtherBeta Xi House Corporation of Kappa Kappa Gamma FraternityBETA THETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY — $3,381,196 · OtherBETA THETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITYDELTA IOTA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KA — $1,229,493 · OtherDELTA IOTA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA HOUSE CORPORATION — $769,127 · Other+11 more — $3,112,139 · Other+11 moreBETA CHI HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA — $472,453 · Education
Other$19,802,624Education$472,453

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY — $7,890,674 over 9y, 17% of budgetBeta Xi House Corporation of Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity — $3,419,995 over 2y, 20% of budgetBETA THETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY — $3,381,196 over 7y, 99% of budgetDELTA IOTA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KA — $1,229,493 over 7y, 31% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA HOUSE CORPORATION — $769,127 over 6y, 25% of budgetGAMMA NU HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA — $656,047 over 1y, 32% of budgetBETA CHI HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA — $472,453 over 3y, 26% of budgetDELTA PSI HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY — $325,412 over 5y, 28% of budgetEPSILON BETA HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY — $319,723 over 6y, 17% of budgetEpsilon Alpha House Association Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity — $220,011 over 3y, 61% of budgetBETA NU BUILDING ASSOCIATION — $215,502 over 2y, 24% of budgetGAMMA ZETA BUILDING ASSOCIATION — $122,909 over 2y, 20% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kappa Kappa Gamma Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph