Skip to content

· Public charity

Kansas Farm Bureau Foundation

Strengthening agriculture and the lives of kansans through leadership, education and service.

$646k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$107k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$781kFood & Nutrition$526kYouth Development$60kCrime & Legal$58kEducation$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$20k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $525,515, the rows itemized in this filing. The $646,314 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $120,799 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $316k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$106,827
KANSAS FARM BUREAU$92,307
VANDWATER INC$60,794
JANSSEN BEEF & GRAIN$56,556
WESTERN KANSAS IRRIGATION INC$28,486
AUTONOMOUS PIVOT INT$25,210
MCCLURE FARMS$22,721
KFB LEGAL FOUNDATION$15,000
KOPPER FAMILY FARMS$12,540
KANSAS FFA FOUNDATION INC$12,500
KANSAS 4-H FOUNDATION$10,000
KFAC IN THE CLASSROOM$10,000
KANSAS FARM FOOD CONNECTION$10,000
ARABLE LABS INC$9,359
GREAT PLAINS PRECISION AG INC$9,295
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ETHOS CONNECTED LLC: $24k → 13%ARABLE LABS INC: $15k → 10%Circle C Farms: $17k → 8%Quarter Turn Inc: $26k → 8%VANDWATER INC: $61k → 10%GOOSSEN FARMS INC: $16k → 10%Red Barn Enterprises Inc: $13k → 11%WESTERN KANSAS IRRIGATION INC: $28k → 11%Garden City Company: $10k → 12%JANSSEN BEEF & GRAIN: $57k → 12%Northwest Kansas Technical College: $30k → 13%MCCLURE FARMS: $23k → 13%Syracuse Dairy LLC: $34k → 13%SUMNER COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $14k → 13%Homeland Farms: $18k → 14%AUTONOMOUS PIVOT INT: $25k → 16%Kansas FFA Foundation Inc: $13k → 20%QUARTER TURN INC: $10k → 8%Bestifor Farms: $35k → 10%Goossen Farms Inc: $11k → 10%WESTERN KANSAS IRRIGATION INC: $11k → 11%Northwest KS Technical College: $10k → 13%Water PACK: $17k → 13%EVERY SEASON FARMS LLC: $18k → 14%KANSAS WATER OFFICE: $17k → 14%Kansas 4-H Foundation Inc: $10k → 20%KOPPER FAMILY FARMS: $13k → 8%VANDWATER INC: $23k → 10%QUADE WOOFTER: $10k → 10%Water PACK: $15k → 13%Homeland Farms: $11k → 14%Viaanix Inc: $14k → 16%KANSAS FARM BUREAU: $92k → 20%LEE WHEELER ENGINEERING: $107k → 16%Kansas Farm Bureau: $42k → 20%LEE WHEELER ENGINEERING: $70k → 16%KANSAS FARM BUREAU: $41k → 20%FB CAPITAL MANAGEMENT OF KS INC: $36k → 20%KFB Legal Foundation: $16k → 20%KFB LEGAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 20%KFB LEGAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 20%Kansas Farm Bureau Legal Foundation: $13k → 20%Kansas FFA Foundation Inc: $13k → 20%KANSAS FARM FOOD CONNECTION: $10k → 20%Kansas Farm Food Connection: $10k → 20%NEW BOSTON CREATIVE GROUP: $24k → 20%Kansas Forest Service: $20k → 20%Kansas FFA Foundation Inc: $13k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$927k · 16 repeat orgs$570k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
22

Total granted

$927k
$348k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $222k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    KANSAS FARM BUREAU
    3× · 2023–2025 · $176k · revenue +68%
  • KF
    KANSAS FFA FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $91k · revenue +282%
  • K4
    Kansas 4-H Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • FC
    FB CAPITAL MANAGEMENT OF KS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $36k
  • BF
    Bestifor Farms
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • NK
    Northwest Kansas Technical College
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Farmers Union Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
2
Kansas Grain and Feed Association

To advance and protect the common interest of its members through effective communication and education to its members, the public and government

—
3
Kansas Farm Bureau Foundation

Strengthening agriculture and the lives of kansans through leadership, education and service.

Unclassified
4
Kansas Farmers Union Inc

To support members in farming

—
5
Kansas Livestock Foundation

The primary objective is to operate soley and exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes that advance the interests of the beef industry.

—
6
Kansas Corn Growers Association

To promote and improve the profitability of kansas corn farmers by developing and maintaining domestic and international markets to utilize kansas and us corn production.

Food & Nutrition
7
Kansas Livestock Association

Livestock Industry Promotion & Research

—
8
Kansas Farmhouse Association

Maintain residence for active affiliated chapter. help establish an atmosphere conducive to education & scholastic pursuits among chapter members.

Recreation & Sports
9
Kansas Cooperative Council

The kansas cooperative council exists to promote, support and advance the interests, business success, and understanding of agricultural, utility, credit and consumer cooperatives and their members through legislation and regulatory…

—
10
Kansas State High School Activities

To serve students by providing leadership for the administration of education based interscholastic activities.

Education
11
Kansas Land Trust Inc

To protect and preserve lands of natural, ecological, scenic, historic, agricultural or recreational significance in kansas.

Environment
12
Kansas Pork Association

Promoting pork as the meat of choice while enhancing the success of kansas pork industry

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Ffa Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Riley County Farm Bureau. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $176,627 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKANSAS FARM BUREAU: $175,657 · OtherKANSAS FARM BUREAUKANSAS FFA FOUNDATION INC: $91,000 · OtherKANSAS FFA FOUNDATION INCVANDWATER INC: $60,794 · OtherJANSSEN BEEF & GRAIN: $56,556 · OtherHomeland Farms: $51,088 · OtherSyracuse Dairy LLC: $48,875 · Other+40 more: $718,454 · Other+40 moreKansas 4-H Foundation Inc: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentKANSAS FARM BUREAU LEGAL FOUNDATION: $58,346 · Philanthropy
Other$1,379,051Youth Development$60,000Philanthropy$58,346

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKANSAS FARM BUREAU: $175,657 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKANSAS FFA FOUNDATION INC: $91,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetKansas 4-H Foundation Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKANSAS FARM BUREAU LEGAL FOUNDATION: $58,346 over 4y, 14% of budgetWATER PROTECTION ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL: $40,598 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetKANSAS FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM: $16,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KANSAS FARM BUREAU ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Kansas 4-H Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FARM BUREAU LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WATER PROTECTION ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Manhattan Community FoundationKS13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kansas Farm Bureau Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kansas Farm Bureau Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kansas Farm Bureau’s filings →

    More from the funding graph