· Public charity
K2 Adventures Foundation
To care for children, adults, and families with special needs and/or life changing medical circumstances by providing services, support, and funds that will be used for educational and medical enrichment.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $273,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $747,645 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $474,045 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $182k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Elevate Phoenix | $105,000 |
| Others under reporting threshold | $76,720 |
| Crown's of Courage | $27,750 |
| United Samaritan's Foundation | $20,000 |
| Frontline Healing Foundation | $15,000 |
| Billy's Place | $10,000 |
| Angels on Patrol | $7,530 |
| Hope 4 Kids | $6,500 |
| One Step Beyond | $5,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $179k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $83k to organizations and $96k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Prosthetic center support · Orphanage support · Scholarships
Stated purpose: Under reporting threshold 3 orgs
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HIHOPEKIDS INC6× · 2018–2024 · $173k · revenue +123%
- EPELEVATE PHOENIX2× · 2023–2024 · $116k · revenue +57%
- PCPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation3× · 2017–2019 · $29k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- MPMARICOPA PANTRY INCone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -25%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $59k
- OUOthers under 5Kone grant, 2022 · $47k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
Dedicated to providing financial and emotional support to craniofacial patients and their families, promote educational programs to increase awareness about and acceptance of craniofacial conditions, and support research to improve methods…
The children's cancer fund of new mexico exists to help persons from new mexico who have been diagnosed with and treated for childhood cancer (at a new mexico pediatric oncology facility) and their families cope with the day-to-day…
To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.
To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.
Providing quality, affordable supportive housing for persons with behavioral health needs in maricopa county.
To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.
The brain tumor network (btn) is dedicated to providing compassionate, personalized navigation services to brain tumor patients and caregivers. btn also assists patients in finding clinical trials that may be an appropriate match for them.…
CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.
Improving the health and well-being of children and families in a safe environment through mental health services, education and awareness.
Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Arizona Inc and the most unlike its peers is Maricopa Vfw Post 720. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPEKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds MARICOPA PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds CROWNS OF COURAGE ↗
- Who funds ADVENTURES IN TRAINING WITH A PURPOSE ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN LIFE OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds CORTNEYS PLACE ↗
- Who funds UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENVISION THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP I ↗
- Who funds FRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New America Alliance Institute ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CAMP COLTON INC ↗
- Who funds MOTHER'S GRACE ↗
- Who funds Trends Charitable Fund ↗
- Who funds CAMELOT THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
- Who funds BILLY'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds MARICOPA VFW POST 720 ↗
- Who funds CARIDAD INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association ↗
- Who funds THE ALS ASSNAL CHAPTERINC ↗
- Who funds THE TANNER FOUNDATION FOR NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES ↗
- Who funds CELEBRITY FIGHT NIGHT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANGELS ON PATROL INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds SERVE THE FUTURE AZ ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · John F Long Foundation Inc · Saguaros Childrens Charities · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · American Express Foundation · Pivotal Foundation · Executive Council Charities · Del E Webb Foundation · Fiesta Events Inc · Arizona Diamondbacks Foundationinc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization K2 Adventures Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.