Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Texas · Public charity

Juventud Por Cristo USA

Our mission is to help the families of mexico have a better quality of life. Our focus is on very low income families. We share the message of jesus and also provide for specific needs through various programs. We also organize no-cost health clinics.

$206k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$6k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$5,800
Largest grant, FY2024
$5,800
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2022 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$129k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Juventud Por Cristo USA funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$6k0%
FY20231$29k0%
FY20221$38kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$38kHuman Services$34k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2024.

MEXICO OUTREACH MINISTRY$5,800

Compare Juventud Por Cristo USA with peer funders

About Juventud Por Cristo USA

How much does Juventud Por Cristo USA give?
Juventud Por Cristo USA reported 1 itemized grants totaling $5,800, out of $206,380 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does Juventud Por Cristo USA fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (52%), Human Services (48%).
Does Juventud Por Cristo USA fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Juventud Por Cristo USA based?
Juventud Por Cristo USA is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $213k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Juventud Por Cristo USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home