· Public charity
Justice Resource Institute Inc
Justice resource institute is a leader in social services, with over 100 programs meeting the needs of individuals, families, and communities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $115,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $170,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $55,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $108k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOTHERS FOR JUSTICE & EQUALITY | $25,000 |
| PARENT PROFESSIONAL ADVOCACY LEAGUE INC | $20,000 |
| MAAPS | $20,000 |
| ACRC | $12,500 |
| MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES INC | $10,000 |
| MASS COUNCIL OF HUMAN SERVICE PROVIDERS | $10,000 |
| YOUTH IN CRISIS | $10,000 |
| BOSTON PARKS & RECREATION | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.
The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.
The massachusetts workforce association (mwa) is a statewide membership association that leads, advocates and convenes on behalf of the massachusetts workforce development system.
To achieve better outcomes for children in partnership with families.
The massachusetts alliance for early college (ma4ec) is a cross-sector coalition focused on significantly increasing the number of students with access to high-quality early college in massachusetts to promote college and career success…
Massachusetts children's alliance pioneers the most promising, leading-edge ways that help victims of child abuse.
Provide an environment that positions the realtor as the primary source for real estate services, promotes a positive professional image of the realtor, and advocates preservation and enhancement of the rights to own, use and transfer real…
We seek to improve the quality of life for people living with mental health conditions, their families, and their caregivers. we work to ensure that all people impacted by a mental health condition receive the support they need when they…
The massachusetts legal assistance corporation provides leadership and support to improve civil legal services to low-income people in massachusetts through collaboration with the legal services community, the legislature, the public, the…
The brookline center for community mental health provides groundbreaking mental health services rooted in meaningful innovation and compassionate care. in response to today's mental health landscape and the ongoing mental health crisis,…
Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.
The association of family and conciliation courts (afcc) is an interdisciplinary, international association of professionals dedicated to improving the lives of children and families through the resolution of family conflict. afcc promotes…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mass Assoc of 766 Approved Private Sch and the most unlike its peers is Mothers for Justice and Equality Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOTHERS FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds PARENT PROFESSIONAL ADVOCACY LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds MASS ASSOC OF 766 APPROVED PRIVATE SCH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHILDRENS RESIDENTAL CENTERS ↗
- Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH IN CRISIS MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS COUNCIL OF HUMAN SERVICES PROVIDERS INC ↗
- Who funds Fund for Parks and Recreation - Boston ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Justice Resource Institute Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mothers for Justice and Equality Inc — 40% of income from government
- Parent Professional Advocacy League Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.