Skip to content

· Public charity

Junior Service League of St Au

Educational and cultulal services

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$80kReligion$61kEducation$60kArts & Culture$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kYouth Development$21kEnvironment$8kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $20,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $54,093 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $33,843 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$83k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIDS BRIDGE$10,250
BOY SCOUNTS$5,000
ST AUG LIGHTHOUS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%KIDS BRIDGE: $21k → 6%KIDS BRIDGE: $10k → 6%KIDS BRIDGE: $9k → 6%KIDS BRIDGE: $8k → 6%KIDS BRIDGE: $8k → 6%KIDS BRIDGE: $7k → 6%CHILDRENS HOME S: $7k → 6%HORSE PLAY THERA: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$215k · 6 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$215k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+14%

Still filing today

33%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KB
    KIDS BRIDGE INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $63k · revenue -32%
  • TC
    TAG CHILDRENS MU
    3× · 2018–2020 · $60k
  • SA
    ST AUG LIGHTHOUS
    5× · 2018–2022 · $41k

Funded once

  • SA
    ST AUG LIGHTHOUS
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • TC
    TAG CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ST AUGUSTINE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -61%
  • SA
    ST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +249%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Rosa Kids' House Inc

To deliver a well coordinated and multi-disciplined response to child abuse in an environment that puts children first

Youth Development
2
Emergency Services and Homeless Coalition of St Johns County Inc

To truly make a difference in the lives of St. Johns County homeless families with minor children by providing housing and services required for them to remain intact, stabilize their lives, save money, move into permanent housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
3
St Augustine Society Inc

To create an atmosphere and lifeline of hope that minimizes the suffering of the homeless and the less fortunate.

Housing & Shelter
4
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
5
Hibiscus Children's Center Inc

To provide temporary shelter for abused and neglected children and support families at risk of abuse.

Housing & Shelter
6
Family Foundations Counseling Services

The mission of Family Foundations Counseling Services is to prevent child abuse and neglect, to ensure the wellbeing of every child and youth we serve, and to aid in building strong resilient families.

Health
7
Springs Holistic Center Inc

Provide therapeutic services to children

Human Services
8
Youth Crisis Center Inc

The mission of YCC is to build a healthier community by empowering young people and families to rise above adversity.

Human Services
9
Star House

STAR (Strength, Time, And Resilience) House is a crisis nursery which exists to provide a temporary home away from home for childre and supportive services to uplift and strengthen the entire family.

—
10
Treehouse of Tallahassee Inc

Provide housing for abused children.

Human Services
11
Family Support Center of the Uintah Basin Inc

Child respite and child abuse prevention.

—
12
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Augustine Youth Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tag Children's Museum of St Augustine Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TAG CHILDRENS MU: $60,000 · OtherTAG CHILDRENS MUST AUG LIGHTHOUS: $41,054 · OtherST AUG LIGHTHOUSST AUG YOUTH SER: $17,000 · OtherST AUG YOUTH SERWEBSTER ELEMENT: $17,000 · OtherWEBSTER ELEMENTST AUG LIGHTHOUS: $15,000 · OtherST AUG LIGHTHOUSST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $10,000 · OtherST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INCST AUGUSTINE MARITIME HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherFIREFIGHTERS FOR FAMILIES INC: $7,250 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · Other+2 moreKIDS BRIDGE INC: $62,549 · Human ServicesKIDS BRIDGE INCTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY…HORSEPLAY THERAPY CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHORSEPLAY THERAPY CENTER IN…FIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION: $17,090 · Public Safety & DisasterTAG CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ST AUGUSTINE INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureEPIC Community Services Inc: $6,000 · HealthSt Francis House: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$184,804Human Services$74,549Public Safety & Disaster$17,090Arts & Culture$15,000Health$6,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDS BRIDGE INC: $62,549 over 6y, 24% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION: $17,090 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTAG CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ST AUGUSTINE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFIREFIGHTERS FOR FAMILIES INC: $7,250 over 1y, 23% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPIC Community Services Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHORSEPLAY THERAPY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSt Francis House: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC5.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Junior Service League of St Au funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Junior Service League of St Au. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Epic Community Services Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Horseplay Therapy Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Junior Service League of St Au?

Find your warmest path to Junior Service League of St Au through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Junior Service League of St Au’s filings →

More from the funding graph