Loading…
· Public charity
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF RALEIGH INC
Promoting volunteerism, developing the potential of women, and (continued on schedule o) improving communities through the effective action and leadership of trained volunteers.
$39k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
1
Communities
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Human Services$47kHealth$12kCrime & Legal$8kEducation$5kCommunity Improvement$5k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
—
2023
green chairlives
2024
believehumanityeverybasicgrowwoman girlregardless circumstances
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$6,650
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
- INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE$18,640
- THE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE$6,650
- THE DIAPER TRAIN$6,650
- BEGINNINGS FOR PARENTS OF CHILDREN WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING$6,650
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Carolina Pregnancy Center
We are a crisis pregnancy center offering assistance to all women with pregnancy related issues.
Health
2
Housing for New Hope
Ending homelessness in durham, north carolina
Housing & Shelter
3
Wake County Smart Start Inc
Investing in young children, families, and a brighter future together.
Education
4
North Carolina Partnership for
Advance a high quality, comprehensive, accountable early childhood system that benefits each child in north carolina beginning with a healthy birth.
Education
5
Greenest
To provide furniture for people transitioning out of homelessness into stable housing.
Human Services
6
Church of God Children's Home
To provide a positive and safe living environment for hurting, abused, neglected and at-risk children placed privately and by the nc department of social services.
Human Services
7
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc
To promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.
Human Services
8
Families First-Nc Inc
To strengthen all families by providing parenting information and education and by preventing adolescent pregnancy.
Human Services
9
Northeast Georgia Council On Domestic
To support victims of domestic violence and their families through intervention, prevention and education.
Crime & Legal
10
The Hope Center At Pullen Inc
The hope center at pullen empowers emerging adults who are transitioning out of foster care in wake county with the support and connections needed for a safe and stable adulthood.
Human Services
11
Womens Resource Center of
To promote the self-reliance of women by assessing needs, providing services, and acting as a gateway to community resources; to seek solutions for unmet needs by providing strategic leadership through collaboration and partnerships within…
Human Services
12
Hospice of Wake County Inc
To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Womens Center of Wake County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Garner Road Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$46,940Health$11,650Crime & Legal$7,500Education$5,000Community Improvement$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SAFECHILD ↗
- Who funds THE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE DIAPER TRAIN ↗
- Who funds BEGINNINGS FOR PARENTS OF CHILDREN WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FRANKIE LEMMON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WOMENS CENTER OF WAKE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GARNER ROAD COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Crossroads Fellowship Foundation · Bell Koonce Burnette Foundation · Aj Fletcher Foundation · Carlson Family Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Hillsdale Fund · Captrust Community Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation JUNIOR LEAGUE OF RALEIGH INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.5× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 862721892 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Junior League of Raleigh Inc?
Find your warmest path to Junior League of Raleigh Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines