· Private foundation
Juneja Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CARING HAND FOR CHILDREN | $1,200 |
| GIVING AUSTIN LABOR SUPPORT | $1,044 |
| SIMI VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE | $575 |
| H4H FOUNDATION | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VEVIEWPOINT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2020 · $11k · revenue +40%
- CHCARING HAND FOR CHILDREN6× · 2018–2024 · $6k · revenue +87%
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2018–2019 · $1k
Funded once
- VAVIJAY AMRITRAJ FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +52%
- KKETTOone grant, 2021 · $1k
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HUNGER PROJECT INCone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dosti sets up and manages schools in asian countries
VidyaGyan Next mission is to provide education to underprivileged students andrelated social issues. Following are the misison of VidyaGyan Next:A: Collaboration with Other non-profitB: Expand Access to EducationC: Empower Underprivileged…
Providing education for people who can not afford it in india
Healthy scholars foundation, inc's mission is to support addressing health issues that adversely impact learning.
Support and Research Major Problems in Child Health Globally
Provide no cost education or facilitate by lending funds to other non profits and deserving students,teachers and schools in underserved communities to underserved and remote villages and locations where Governments cannot offer tuition or…
Vsk foundation seeks to identify and select qualified nonprofit organizaitons and equivalent projects, beginning in asia and in particular india, in need of additional charitable assistance.
Provide educational facilities to underpreveleged children
Pratham international was established to support learning innovations for children and youth in contexts across the globe. the organization facilitates the adaptation and dissemination of proven, scalable solutions, such as the…
We desire to improve the health care of children and families in need within the United States as well as developing countries. Through collaboration with established health organizations, we provide essential health services such as…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Hunger Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Global Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VIEWPOINT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARING HAND FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds VIJAY AMRITRAJ FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIVING AUSTIN LABOR SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HUNGER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE TVRC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds International Global Charities ↗
- Who funds THE H4H FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Juneja Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.