How much does June B Gelbart Foundation give?

June B Gelbart Foundation reported 56 grants totaling $258,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 50 and 63 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.

What does June B Gelbart Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (38%), International (28%), Philanthropy (10%).

Who are June B Gelbart Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Impactisrael Inc ($48k), The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America ($47k), American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro Inc ($41k).

Does June B Gelbart Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does June B Gelbart Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as June B Gelbart Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jack Chester Foundation, Jewish Communal Fund, Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc.

Where is June B Gelbart Foundation based?

June B Gelbart Foundation is based in FL.

June B Gelbart Foundation

June B Gelbart Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

June B Gelbart Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$258k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$30k

Largest

01What it funds

0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$582kInternational$434kPhilanthropy$147kHuman Services$88kEducation$55kArts & Culture$42kRecreation & Sports$40kFood & Nutrition$39kOther$0

02FY2025 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k49 grants · $136k
$10k–50k7 grants · $122k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.1M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM	$30,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND	$28,000
GULF COAST JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY	$16,000
HILLEL FDN AT UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA	$14,000
HILLELS OF THE FLORIDA SUNCOAST	$12,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PINELLAS PASCO	$12,000
IMPACTISRAEL	$10,000
SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE	$8,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL	$8,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIIT ISSIE SHAPIRO	$7,000
THE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF	$6,000
ALYN HOSPITAL AMERICAN FRIENDS OF	$5,000
ELI THE ISRAEL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILD	$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL	$5,000
RAMAH DAROM	$5,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of June B Gelbart Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

June B Gelbart Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

How this is measured

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.3M · 73 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

73 repeat relationships: 46 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.3M

$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%

+77%

Still filing today

52%

27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

II
IMPACTISRAEL INC
6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +108%
TS
THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA
6× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +52%
AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC
6× · 2020–2025 · $41k · revenue +16%

Funded once

MF
MASORTI FOUNDATION CONSERVATIVE
one grant, 2022 · $4k
AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL INTELLIGENCE
one grant, 2023 · $3k
AF
American Friends Of Or National Missionsgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +155%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sherit Isroel

—

University of Judaism Foundation

—

American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion

Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc

Youth Development

Idf Memorial Foundation

Philanthropy

American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion

American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation

Philanthropy

American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah

—

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

Friends of Institute for Zionist

The organization seeks to reinforce the foundations of israel as a jewish and democratic state. it acts to promote programs to educate the israeli public on the importance of both values and to demonstrate how each contributes to and…

International

American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education

Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Bar-Ilan University; the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

54/55

Grantees still filing

42/55

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$901,000International$276,000Philanthropy$199,000Human Services$63,000Arts & Culture$37,000Recreation & Sports$31,000Religion$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Chester FoundationFL55.9× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Chester Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Slomo and Cindy Silvian Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization June B Gelbart Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from June B Gelbart Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

12get no government money at all

2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to June B Gelbart Foundation?

Find your warmest path to June B Gelbart Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on June B Gelbart’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home