Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julieliem Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700k
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

International$1.7MReligion$1.4MHealth$1.4MHuman Services$1.0MEducation$550kArts & Culture$363kCommunity Improvement$300kEnvironment$140kOther$0
02FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $490k
$35,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITEE$100,000
FRIENDS OF KING GEORGE VI$100,000
OXFAM AMERICA$100,000
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$100,000
KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION US$90,000
AMERICAN CHESTNUT LAND TRUST$40,000
KIRKRIDGE RETREAT CENTER$35,000
CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PITTSBURGH FDN$30,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$20,000
MARYKNOLL LAY MISSIONERS$20,000
MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS$20,000
ST JOHN VIANNEY CHURCH$20,000
MARYKNOLL SISTERS$15,000
THOMAS MERTON CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HEKIMA PLACE: $20k → 11%HEKIMA PLACE: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 27 repeat orgs$600k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2021, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
3

Total granted

$6.0M
$500k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+67%

Still filing today

48%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
InternationalEducationHealthEnvironmentArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +49%
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $500k · revenue +29%
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $90k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • SO
    SOPHIA OXFORD INC
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue -81% · 64% of their budget
  • TE
    The Episcopal Church
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
7
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
10
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $860,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEEMARYKNOLL LAY MISSIONERS: $740,000 · OtherMARYKNOLL LAY MISSIONERSFRIENDS OF KING GEORGE VI: $360,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF KING GEORGE VICARE INTERNATIONAL: $300,000 · OtherCARE INTERNATIONALMEDICAL MISSION SISTERS: $240,000 · OtherMEDICAL MISSION SISTERSMARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $140,000 · OtherMARYKNOLL SISTERS: $135,000 · OtherKIRKRIDGE RETREAT CENTER: $115,000 · Other+10 more: $546,000 · Other+10 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $1,120,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $550,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCMYRIAD USA INC: $300,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $100,000 · InternationalInternational Rescu…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $90,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATION…Thomas Merton Center Inc: $70,000 · InternationalThomas Merton Cente…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $60,000 · InternationalAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $500,000 · EducationAMERICANS…MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $60,000 · EducationMEHARRY M…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…SOPHIA OXFORD INC: $300,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CHESTNUT LAND TRUST INC: $140,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $60,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,436,000Health$1,220,000International$1,170,000Education$610,000Public Benefit$300,000Environment$140,000Crime & Legal$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $1,120,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $550,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $500,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSOPHIA OXFORD INC: $300,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $300,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CHESTNUT LAND TRUST INC: $140,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThomas Merton Center Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS Resource Foundation for Children: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHEKIMA PLACE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetADULT DAY CARE OF CALVERT COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds SOPHIA OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CHESTNUT LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Thomas Merton Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds AIDS Resource Foundation for Children ↗
  • Who funds HEKIMA PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADULT DAY CARE OF CALVERT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julieliem Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julieliem Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julieliem Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph