Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julian T Turner Charitable Trust Regions Bank

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$204kReligion$178kFood & Nutrition$122kPhilanthropy$115kEducation$100kPublic Benefit$35kArts & Culture$32kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$5,570
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$55,000
HERRING HOUSE OF DOTHAN$20,000
THE CITY OF THOMASVILLE$5,570
ALABAMA SOCIETY OF THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION$5,570
EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 16% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $55k → 17%ALABAMA SOCIETY SONS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION GENERAL GALVEZ CHAPTER: $8k → 18%ALABAMA SOCIETY OF THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $6k → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION O SOUTH ALABAMA: $7k → 19%TROY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 27%OMNI: $20k → 8%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $35k → 17%ALABAMA SOCIETY OF THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $5k → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $6k → 19%THE CITY OF THOMASVILLE: $9k → 24%OMNI: $5k → 8%HERRING HOUSE OF DOTHAN: $28k → 17%THE CITY OF THOMASVILLE: $7k → 24%THE HARBOR CHURCH: $25k → 17%THE CITY OF THOMASVILLE: $6k → 24%HERRING HOUSE OF DOTHAN: $20k → 17%WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP: $20k → 17%WIREGRASS UNITED WAY: $19k → 17%HERRING HOUSES OF DOTHAN: $19k → 17%THE HARBOR CHURCH: $18k → 17%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $18k → 17%THE HARBOR CHURCH: $17k → 17%HERRING HOUSE OF DOTHAN: $15k → 17%THE HARBOR CHURCH: $13k → 17%WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP: $13k → 17%WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP: $11k → 17%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 17%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 17%THE HARBOR CHURCH: $10k → 17%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 17%WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP: $10k → 17%WALLACE COLLEGE: $10k → 17%HERRING HOUSE OF DOTHAN: $10k → 17%HERRING HOUSES OF DOTHAN: $10k → 17%HERRING HOUSE OF DOTHAN: $10k → 17%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $9k → 17%EVERGREEN FOOD BANK: $8k → 17%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $8k → 17%PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $6k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $24k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 17%WIREGRASS UNITED WAY: $15k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $13k → 17%WIREGRASS UNITED WAY: $10k → 17%WIREGRASS UNITED WAY: $9k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7k → 17%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CHARATIES: $20k → 17%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CHARATIES: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$725k · 17 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$725k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+210%

Still filing today

18%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEnvironmentPhilanthropyReligionHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $104k
  • TH
    THE HARBOR CHURCH
    7× · 2017–2023 · $92k
  • HH
    HERRING HOUSE OF DOTHAN
    5× · 2019–2024 · $83k

Funded once

  • GL
    GAP LAKE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -79%
  • WC
    WALLACE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • EF
    EVERGREEN FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wiregrass Rc&D Council

To develop natural and human resources to furher conservation for the benefit of the general public To promote soil and water conservation To develop the natural resources in a 10 county area of Alabama

Environment
2
Wiregrass Economic Development Corporation

To promote commercial and industrial growth and prosperity for the city of enterprise, coffee county and geneva county, alabama. the board will pursue a program which includes, but is not limited to: (1) establish and maintain a support…

—
3
Wiregrass Pet Rescue & Adoption Center Inc

The wiregrass pet rescue and adoption center is dedicated to creating an exemplary animal shelter and pet adoption and community friendly facility in dothan/houston county, alabama. wprac will provide for the basic needs for domesticated…

Animals
4
West Alabama Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to help alleviate hunger and food insecurity in west alabama.

—
5
Wiregrass Aviation Support Program
Public Safety & Disaster
6
Wiregrass Angel House Inc

The organization provides direct services to families of homocide victims through crime scene clean-up, funeral and financial arrangements, and crises and trauma counseling. the organization serves southeast alabama.

Health
7
Wise Area Relief Mission

The mission of w.a.r.m. is compassion and assistance as a response to god's grace through jesus christ by offering services to those in need in wise county in an effort to promote a productive sharing community.

Human Services
8
Save a Pet Rescue Adoption and Transport Inc

To work with animals concentrating on animal welfare, adoption, spay/neuter, and community awareness in the wiregrass area. in addition, we work with other shelters throughout the southeast by transporting adoptable animals to locations…

Animals
9
West Alabama Action Group Inc
Community Improvement
10
Wiregrass Animal Group Inc

To facilitate a no-kill solution for shelters and strays in the wiregrass area.

Animals
11
Wiregrass Museum of Art Inc

Operation of a public art museum

Arts & Culture
12
Wiregrass Christian Youth Camp Inc

To provide a summer camp facility within a christian environment. approximately 750 children are served annually.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wiregrass United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ala-Tom Rc&D Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $104,000 · OtherEVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTHE HARBOR CHURCH: $91,500 · OtherTHE HARBOR CHURCHHERRING HOUSE OF DOTHAN: $82,725 · OtherHERRING HOUSE OF DOTHANFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $66,745 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHPROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $61,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLWIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC: $58,325 · OtherWIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INCFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CHARATIES: $30,000 · OtherHERRING HOUSES OF DOTHAN: $29,000 · OtherTHE CITY OF THOMASVILLE: $26,570 · OtherOMNI: $25,000 · OtherTHOMASVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $23,500 · Other+13 more: $94,850 · Other+13 moreWIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC: $63,420 · PhilanthropyWIREGRASS …THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $9,845 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUN…GAP LAKE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · ReligionWIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBLAYNE HARDY BARFIELD FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthWIREGRASS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterALA-TOM RC&D COUNCIL INC: $5,000 · Environment
Other$693,215Philanthropy$73,265Religion$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Health$5,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC: $63,420 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC: $58,325 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetGAP LAKE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetWIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $9,845 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWIREGRASS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALA-TOM RC&D COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds GAP LAKE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds BLAYNE HARDY BARFIELD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALA-TOM RC&D COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wiregrass FoundationAL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wiregrass Foundation · The Paul & Barbara Flowers Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julian T Turner Charitable Trust Regions Bank funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julian T Turner Charitable Trust Regions Bank. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Julian T Turner Charitable Trust Regions Bank?

    Find your warmest path to Julian T Turner Charitable Trust Regions Bank through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julian T Turner Charitable Trust Regions Bank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph