Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Judith E and Gary S Rubin Foundat

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$47kReligion$17kFood & Nutrition$680Civil Rights$480Public Benefit$460Health$380International$250Philanthropy$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$182k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF ASPE$10,000
ASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION$3,972
METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD$500
SO POVERTY LAW CENTER$100
Individual grant recipient$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 7% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $180 → 12%MAZON INC A JEWISH RESPONSE TO HUNGER: $100 → 14%ISRAEL POLICY FORUM: $250 → 17%TIFERETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%SO POVERTY LAW CENTER: $100 → 18%MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF ASPE: $10k → 6%TACAW: $100 → 7%INTERFAITH FUNDERS INC: $100 → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS: $380 → 12%YIDDISH BOOK CENTER: $180 → 12%MAZON: $180 → 14%METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $500 → 17%TIFERETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC: $9k → 6%JEWISHCOLORADO: $360 → 12%NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $100 → 12%METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $500 → 17%TIFERETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF ASPEN INC: $9k → 6%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $200 → 12%METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $250 → 17%TIFERETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF ASPEN INC: $9k → 6%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $100 → 12%METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $250 → 17%MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF ASPEN INC: $9k → 6%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $100 → 12%METROPOLITAN OPERA GUILD: $250 → 17%ASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION: $4k → 6%JUPITER SYMPHONY OF NEW YORK: $100 → 17%ASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION: $3k → 6%JUPITER SYMPHONY: $50 → 17%ASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION: $3k → 6%JUPITER SYMPHONY OF NEW YORK: $34 → 17%ASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION: $3k → 6%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $185 → 17%ASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION: $3k → 6%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $115 → 17%ASPEN PUBLIC RADIO: $250 → 6%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $200 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$54k · 9 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$54k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+28%

Still filing today

100%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureMembership BenefitFood & NutritionInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $34k · revenue +410%
  • AJ
    Aspen Jewish Center
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +96%
  • NY
    NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $460 · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC
    one grant, 2022 · $380 · revenue -33%
  • IF
    INTEGRITY FIRST FOR AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $360 · revenue -95%
  • AP
    ASPEN PUBLIC RADIO
    one grant, 2020 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
3
The Jewish Publication Society

Our mission has always been to enhance jewish literacy through the publication of great books.

4
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
5
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
6
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
7
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
8
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
9
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

10
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
11
American Zionist Movement Inc

Working across a broad ideolgical, political, and religious spectrum linking the american jewish community together in support of israel, zionism and the jewish people

Religion
12
Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations

Coordinates consensus building and policy development, and pursues collective action maximizing resources among 50 national jewish organizations to address issues of national and international concern to strengthen ties between citizens of…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel Policy Forum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Integrity First for America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $34,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INCThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc — $1,750 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $894 · Arts & CultureAspen Jewish Center — $14,580 · OtherAspen Jewish CenterMUSIC ASSOCIATION OF ASPE — $10,000 · OtherMUSIC ASSOCIATION OF ASPE+8 more — $1,440 · Other+8 moreTIFERETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Membership BenefitFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $400 · Food & NutritionROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $380 · HealthJEWISHColorado — $360 · PhilanthropyISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC — $250 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $180 · Civil Rights
Arts & Culture$36,644Other$26,020Membership Benefit$2,000Food & Nutrition$400Health$380Philanthropy$360International$250Civil Rights$180

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $34,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAspen Jewish Center — $14,580 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTIFERETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc — $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $460 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTEGRITY FIRST FOR AMERICA INC — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUPITER SYMPHONY OF NEW YORK INC — $134 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Judith E and Gary S Rubin Foundat funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Judith E and Gary S Rubin Foundat?

Find your warmest path to Judith E and Gary S Rubin Foundat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph