Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

JTC Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$102kArts & Culture$47kHuman Services$12kReligion$9kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$2kEnvironment$2kPublic Benefit$500
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$271k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECLAT FOUNDATION$6,000
ECLAT FOUNDATION$6,000
DALLAS OPERA$5,000
TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES FOUNDATION$4,000
PHAP VUONG TEMPLE$2,000
DALLAS CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER$1,000
TX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS ASSOCIATION$729
UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC$500
INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOCIETY DALLAS$500
DALLAS BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION INC$500
DALLAS ARBORETUM & BOTANICAL$375
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 42% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%TCCNA FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%PHAP VUONG TEMPLE: $2k → 15%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $18k → 5%TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%DALLAS CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 14%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $13k → 5%DALLAS CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 14%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $13k → 5%DALLAS BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION INC: $800 → 14%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $13k → 5%INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOCIETY DALLAS: $800 → 14%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $9k → 5%INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOCIETY DALLAS: $750 → 14%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $6k → 5%DALLAS BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION INC: $750 → 14%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $6k → 5%INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOCIETY DALLAS: $500 → 14%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $6k → 5%DALLAS BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION INC: $500 → 14%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $5k → 5%INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOCIETY DALLAS: $500 → 14%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $1k → 5%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $6k → 5%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $6k → 5%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 5%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS: $1k → 14%TX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%GREATER DALLAS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%TX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%GREATER DALLAS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%GREATER DALLAS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%TX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%GREATER DALLAS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%GREATER DALLAS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%TX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $812 → 14%TX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $729 → 14%THE SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 14%THE SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 14%PARKLAND FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%DALLAS OPERA: $7k → 14%DALLAS OPERA: $5k → 14%DALLAS OPERA: $5k → 14%DALLAS OPERA: $5k → 14%DALLAS OPERA: $4k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%DALLAS OPERA: $4k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%DALLAS OPERA: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$169k · 12 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$169k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+35%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPublic BenefitPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    ECLAT FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +174%
  • TD
    The Dallas Opera
    7× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +11%
  • TP
    TX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS
    6× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +35%
  • PF
    PARKLAND FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +30%
  • AF
    ASIAN FILM FOUNDATION OF DALLAS
    one grant, 2019 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us-China Chamber of Commerce Dallas

Chamber of commerce

Community Improvement
2
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

3
Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals Joc

To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
4
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

5
Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

Health
6
Dallas Theater Center

Dtc will engage, entertain, and inspire our diverse community by creating experiences that stimulate new ways of thinking and living and by producing plays, educational programs, and other initiatives that are of the highest quality and…

Arts & Culture
7
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
8
The Shakespeare Festival of Dallas dba Shakespeare Dallas

Using Shakespeare's works as a cornerstone, Shakespeare Dallas serves the Southwest region with fun and accessible indoor and outdoor theatre, integrated school programs, and cultural enrichment for people of all ages and backgrounds.

9
Dallas County Indigent Care

Dallas county indigent care corporation, (dcicc) a texas nonprofit membership corporation, is organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code…

Health
10
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
11
The Dallas Opera Foundation

Provide financial support to the dallas opera.

Philanthropy
12
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Health Resources Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Tx Performing Chinese Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ECLAT FOUNDATION — $99,500 · PhilanthropyECLAT FOUNDATIONThe Dallas Opera — $32,500 · Arts & CultureThe Dallas OperaTX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS — $7,241 · OtherTX PERFORMING CH…DALLAS CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER — $4,500 · OtherDALLAS CHINESE C…INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST PROGRESS SOCIETY DALLAS — $3,550 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BU…DALLAS BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION INC — $3,550 · OtherDALLAS BUDDHIST …THE SALVATION ARMY — $3,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION AR…NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $2,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD…PHAP VUONG TEMPLE — $2,000 · OtherPHAP VUONG TEMPL…+1 more — $500 · OtherGREATER DALLAS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $7,200 · EducationDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationTexas Health Resources Foundation — $4,000 · HealthPARKLAND FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthTexas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas — $500 · HealthUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $2,919 · Public BenefitTCCNA — $500 · Public BenefitDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $1,800 · EnvironmentJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS — $1,200 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$99,500Arts & Culture$32,500Other$26,341Education$9,200Health$5,500Public Benefit$3,419Environment$1,800Recreation & Sports$1,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetECLAT FOUNDATION — $99,500 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetThe Dallas Opera — $32,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS — $7,241 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetDALLAS CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER — $4,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $2,919 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS — $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTCCNA — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTexas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ECLAT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Dallas Opera
  • Who funds TX PERFORMING CHINESE ARTS
  • Who funds GREATER DALLAS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DALLAS CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS
  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TCCNA
  • Who funds Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization JTC Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to JTC Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to JTC Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph