Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joya Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2020
5
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Joya Charitable Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Johnson Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Joya Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $68k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
3
’18
3
’19
5
’20
0
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$1.3MCivil Rights$47kHealth$25kEnvironment$20kCommunity Improvement$20kRecreation & Sports$8kArts & Culture$3kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2020 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS$20,000
CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$10,000
ADVANCEMENT PROJECT$10,000
FRIENDS OF PERALTA HACIENDA HISTORICAL PARK$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE: $20k → 16%FRIENDS OF PERALTA HACIENDA HISTORICAL PARK: $8k → 10%ADVANCEMENT PROJECT: $10k → 14%NEO PHILANTHROPY INC: $5k → 17%alumni assoc of the bronx high school of science: $3k → 28%FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS: $20k → 14%THE JOHNSON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1.2M → 16%Anglo-American Charitable Foundation: $39k → 8%charities aid foundation of america: $3k → 9%NEO PHILANTHROPY INC: $5k → 17%FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS: $10k → 14%RIVER STREET DEVELOPMENT FUND: $11k → 16%ANGLO-AMERICAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10k → 17%FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS: $7k → 14%RIVER STREET DEVELOPMENT FUND: $9k → 16%ANGLO-AMERICAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10k → 17%ANGLO-AMERICAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$92k · 4 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -96% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$92k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-96%

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Public BenefitInternationalHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $37k · revenue +2%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $25k · revenue +50%
  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • AF
    american Friends of English National Opera
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • AA
    ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE BRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
3
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
4
Foreign Policy for America

Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.

—
5
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc

ACF is dedicated to supporting and increasing philanthropy by making grants to tax exempt organizations for their charitable, educational, scientific, literary or other 501c3 activities; promoting donor education and engagement, and civic…

Philanthropy
6
Partners of the Americas Foundation

To advance the social economic well being of the americas.

International
7
Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst Association Inc

The chartered alternative investment analyst association, inc. (caia) is a global professional credentialing body dedicated to creating greater alignment, transparency, and knowledge for all investors, with a specific emphasis on…

Community Improvement
8
Fund for the Global Fund

To encourage individuals, corporations, foundations and donor governments to support the global fund, an international foundation focused on ending three of the world's most deadly infectious diseases.

Human Services
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
10
Oxfam America Action Fund Inc

Oxfam america action fund (oaaf) is a partner organization to oxfam america. oaaf strives to end global poverty, hunger, and social injustice through legislative lobbying and political advocacy.

Civil Rights
11
Humane Farming Action Fund

Lobbying activities in support of humane farming association's charitable purposes.

—
12
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charities Aid Foundation America; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Peralta Hacienda Historical Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNSON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,244,719 · PhilanthropyJOHNSON CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDANGLO-AMERICAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION LTD: $82,037 · PhilanthropyANGLO-AMERICAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION LTD+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $37,000 · InternationalRIVER STREET DEVELOPMENT FUND: $19,550 · Otheramerican Friends of English National Opera: $3,000 · OtherALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE BRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE: $2,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $25,000 · HealthCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentCATALYST CALIFORNIA: $10,000 · Public BenefitNEO Philanthropy Inc: $10,000 · Public BenefitFRIENDS OF PERALTA HACIENDA HISTORICAL PARK: $8,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$1,329,256International$37,000Other$25,050Health$25,000Environment$20,000Public Benefit$20,000Arts & Culture$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNSON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,244,719 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetANGLO-AMERICAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION LTD: $82,037 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PERALTA HACIENDA HISTORICAL PARK: $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE BRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joya Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joya Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joya’s filings →

    More from the funding graph