Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joy Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$71kHuman Services$66kHealth$27kReligion$16kAnimals$3kCrime & Legal$500Recreation & Sports$300Housing & Shelter$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$8,903
Median grant
7
States reached
$43k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$20,000
CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER$20,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$10,000
CAMPUS OUTREACH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,903
BOYS TOWN$1,000
Individual grant recipient$700
TURNING POINT USA$100
TUSKEGEE AIRMEN$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 9%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $20k → 10%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%NEW VISION FOR INDEPENDANCE: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
NE
VA
AZ
TN
NC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 15 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +70% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
11

Total granted

$193k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+70%

Still filing today

33%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthMembership BenefitRecreation & SportsAnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +99%
  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
    5× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +36%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • LI
    LOVEYLOAVES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
2
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
3
Genesis Health Inc

To advance health and well-being of persons requiring rehabilitation through superior outcomes, service, education and research.

Health
4
Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters

Dedicated to the mission of providing the best possible care and services for all children who come to us because of sickness and injury.

Health
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
7
Stc Healthcare Partners Llc

Website: https://towerhealth.org/locations/st-christophers-hospital- children stc opco, llc (st. christopher's hospital for children) provides a full range of high-quality healthcare services to all children and youth up to age 21 who seek…

Health
8
St Joseph's Health System Subordinate Group Return

We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.

—
9
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
10
Suncoast Center Inc

For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…

Health
11
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
12
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Sumter Children's Advocacy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Loveyloaves Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMPUS OUTREACH: $69,000 · OtherCAMPUS OUTREACHIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDSHIP CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $14,903 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHRINERS CHILDREN'S: $12,000 · OtherSHRINERS CHILDREN'SIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · Other+12 more: $19,100 · Other+12 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $24,000 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOS…Christian Care Center Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesChristian Ca…Father Flanagan's Boys' Home: $4,600 · Human ServicesFather Flana…+2 more: $500 · Human ServicesLOVEYLOAVES INC: $3,000 · AnimalsLAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $500 · Crime & LegalSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $100 · Recreation & SportsTUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC: $100 · Membership Benefit
Other$174,503Health$26,000Human Services$25,100Animals$3,000Crime & Legal$500Recreation & Sports$100Membership Benefit$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Care Center Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $4,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOVEYLOAVES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VISION FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds LOVEYLOAVES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VISION FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
  • Who funds TUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joy Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Joy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joy’s filings →

More from the funding graph