Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joshua Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$586k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$657kReligion$633kPublic Safety & Disaster$550kHuman Services$292kAnimals$256kEnvironment$104kEducation$52kFood & Nutrition$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $459k
$44,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COCONINO HUMANE ASSOCIATON$130,400
ST JOHNS CATHOLIC CHURCH$81,000
ST CHARLES BORROMEO$75,696
CITY OF WILLIAMS$63,671
Individual grant recipient$56,500
Individual grant recipient$51,500
ST FRANCIS CATHOLIC CHURCH$44,000
ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$40,000
HORSES WITH HEART INC$15,000
CORNERSTONE MISSION PROJECT INC$9,100
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$7,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS$5,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
LITURGICAL PUBLICATIONS INC$1,423
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CORNERSTONE MISSION PROJECT INC: $31k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION PROJECT INC: $9k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION PROJECT INC: $3k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION PROJECT INC: $2k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION PROJECT INC: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 28 repeat orgs$834k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
24

Total granted

$1.9M
$706k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+29%

Still filing today

21%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    Cornerstone Mission Project Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +35%
  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
    3× · 2017–2019 · $24k · revenue +98%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $2k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY GREATER HOUSTON
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GALVESTON-HOU
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
  • HC
    High Country Fire-Rescuegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +77% · 42% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
2
The Peregrine Fund Inc

To change the future for nature and humanity by conserving birds of prey worldwide.

—
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign

The american wild horse campaign is the nation's leading conservation organization dedicated to preserving the freedom and habitat of wild horses and burros. through its initiatives in advocacy, conservation, land preservation, and legal…

Animals
5
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
6
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
7
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
8
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
9
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
10
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
11
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
12
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Parks Conservation Association; the most unlike its peers is Cornerstone Mission Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF WILLIAMS: $655,977 · OtherCITY OF WILLIAMSTHE SALVATION ARMY GREATER HOUSTON: $250,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY GREATER HOUSTONCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GALVESTON-HOU: $250,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GALVESTON-HOUST CHARLES BORROMEO: $205,696 · OtherST CHARLES BORROMEOFOR VETERANS SAKE FOUNDATION: $202,827 · OtherFOR VETERANS SAKE FOUNDATIONST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $196,993 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCHCOCONINO HUMANE ASSOCIATON: $142,885 · OtherCOCONINO HUMANE ASSOCIATONST JOHNS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $106,000 · Other+39 more: $481,997 · Other+39 moreHigh Country Fire-Rescue: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationCornerstone Mission Project Inc: $45,300 · Human ServicesDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $23,500 · ReligionHORSES WITH HEART INC: $15,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,375 · Health+1 more: $400 · HealthCOCONINO COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $1,700 · AnimalsCOCHISE CANINE RESCUE: $1,000 · Animals
Other$2,492,375Public Safety & Disaster$60,000Education$50,000Human Services$45,300Religion$23,500Health$22,775Animals$2,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHigh Country Fire-Rescue: $50,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstone Mission Project Inc: $45,300 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $23,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHORSES WITH HEART INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,430 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOCONINO COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $1,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $295 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds High Country Fire-Rescue ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstone Mission Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds HORSES WITH HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COCONINO COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joshua Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joshua Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joshua’s filings →

    More from the funding graph