Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph L Carley Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$276k
Granted FY2017
15
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $216k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILLVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE$50,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CAPE MAY$30,000
LEVOY THEATRE PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC$30,000
WHEATON ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER$30,000
FAMCARE INC$30,000
SALVATION ARMY$29,503
GLOBAL DIALOGUE INSTITUTE$26,500
MILLVILLE WOMEN'S CLUB$20,000
RIVERFRONT RENAISSANCE CENTER OF THE ART$10,000
SHIRLEY EVES CENTER$10,000
HELP AND HOPE MINISTERIES$5,000
GLOBAL SECURITY INSTITUTE$1,750
Individual grant recipient$1,750
MILLVILLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$1,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY$672
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAIR DISTRICTS PA: $2k → 12%GLOBAL DIALOGUE INSTITUTE: $27k → 17%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CAPE MAY: $30k → 10%MILLVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE: $50k → 16%GLOBAL SECURITY INSTITUTE: $2k → 17%WHEATON ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER: $30k → 16%LEVOY THEATRE PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $30k → 16%MILLVILLE WOMEN'S CLUB: $20k → 16%SHIRLEY EVES CENTER: $10k → 16%FAMCARE INC: $30k → 16%RIVERFRONT RENAISSANCE CENTER OF THE ART: $10k → 16%SALVATION ARMY: $30k → 16%HELP AND HOPE MINISTERIES: $5k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: $672 → 16%MILLVILLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILLVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE: $50,000 · OtherMILLVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCEWheaton Arts & Cultural Center Inc: $30,000 · OtherWheaton Arts & Cultural Center IncFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CAPE MAY: $30,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CAPE MAYSALVATION ARMY: $29,503 · OtherSALVATION ARMYGLOBAL DIALOGUE INSTITUTE: $26,500 · OtherGLOBAL DIALOGUE INSTITUTEMILLVILLE WOMEN'S CLUB: $20,000 · OtherMILLVILLE WOMEN'S CLUBSHIRLEY EVES CENTER: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $3,422 · OtherLEVOY THEATRE PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $30,000 · Arts & CultureLEVOY THEATRE PR…Riverfront Renaissance Center for the Arts: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRiverfront Renai…FAMCARE INC: $30,000 · HealthFAMCARE INCHELP AND HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · ReligionGlobal Security Institute: $1,750 · International
Other$199,425Arts & Culture$40,000Health$30,000Religion$5,000International$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMCARE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLEVOY THEATRE PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $30,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetWheaton Arts & Cultural Center Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRiverfront Renaissance Center for the Arts: $10,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetGlobal Security Institute: $1,750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMillville Development Corp: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oceanfirst FoundationNJ13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oceanfirst Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph L Carley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph L Carley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Famcare Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Wheaton Arts & Cultural Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph L Carley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joseph L Carley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph L Carley’s filings →

More from the funding graph