Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph Elias Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$474kReligion$82kHuman Services$31kFood & Nutrition$20kInternational$11kHealth$6kCommunity Improvement$5kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$218
Median grant
3
States reached
$118k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PGH$52,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$10,916
SQUIRREL HILL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$3,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$1,800
JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING$1,000
CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
JEWISH CEMETERY & BURIAL ASSOCIATION$500
HOLOCAUST CENTER OF PITTSBURGH$250
Individual grant recipient$218
ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND$200
BLAWNOX VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$150
B'NAI B'RITH INTERNATIONAL$110
Individual grant recipient$100
PARKVIEW PLEASANT VALLEY FIRE ASSOCIATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BONEI OLAM: $100 → 20%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $5k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $2k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $2k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $1k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $1k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $1k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $1k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $1k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $500 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $500 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$363k · 24 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
15

Total granted

$363k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+195%

Still filing today

17%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PGH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $212k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $76k
  • SH
    SQUIRREL HILL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI-AFL
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +70%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    one grant, 2018 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

—
3
Jewish Agency for Israel - North American Council

The jewish agency for israel - north american council (the organization"), was organized to work with and in support of nonprofit organizations in israel active in the fields of aliyah (immigration) and absorption; service to vulnerable…

International
4
Jewish Fertility Foundation Inc

The jewish fertility foundation (jff) engages hopeful parents by providing financial assistance, emotional support, and infertility education to those struggling to build their families.

Health
5
Youngstown Area Jewish Federation

The mission of the youngstown area jewish federation is to sustain and enrich the quality of life for the jewish people regionally, in israel and worldwide. we are guided by the values of tzedkah (righteousness), klal yisrael (the…

Philanthropy
6
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
7
The Jewish Federation of Nwi Inc

Enriching jewish life in northwest indiana, in israel and around the world through service, programming, advocacy and fundraising.

—
8
Jewish Community Council of Erie

The Jewish Community Council of Erie is a community-based organization serving individuals and families in the Erie area with a wide range of social and educational services, as well as capacity-building support to other community-based…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Federation of Cumberland Gloucester & Salem Counties

Advancement of the Jewish Community

Philanthropy
10
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
11
American Friends of Jewish Hospitals and Education Centers of Brazil Inc
Philanthropy
12
Jews for Racial and Economic Justice Action Inc

Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Association On Aging; the most unlike its peers is Animal Protectors of Allegheny Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PGH: $212,250 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PGHCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $75,966 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMSQUIRREL HILL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $20,000 · OtherSQUIRREL HILL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRYJEWISH FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND dba JEWISH ASSISTANCE FUND: $14,000 · Other+31 more: $27,199 · Other+31 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $262,107 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGHJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $14,900 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $10,700 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,000 · Civil RightsACHIEVA: $100 · HealthEPILEPSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA: $50 · HealthAnimal Protectors of Allegheny Valley: $25 · Animals
Other$349,415Philanthropy$262,107Human Services$16,500International$10,700Civil Rights$1,000Health$150Animals$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $262,107 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $14,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND dba JEWISH ASSISTANCE FUND: $14,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $10,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Protectors of Allegheny Valley: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND dba JEWISH ASSISTANCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVA ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

David S Shapira FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David S Shapira Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph Elias Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph Elias Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joseph Elias Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Joseph Elias Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph Elias’ filings →

    More from the funding graph