Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph & May Winston Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$122kHuman Services$94kInternational$68kHousing & Shelter$68kAnimals$67kHealth$57kEducation$28kArts & Culture$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$1,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Welcome To America Project$25,000
Hand in Hand$10,000
Valley Beit Midrash$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Yatom$5,000
AZ Humane Society$5,000
Prescott Area Shelter Services$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
International Institute$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
TreeHouse Wildlife$3,000
Partners for Pets Humane$3,000
Community House$2,000
KJZZ$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Shelter Box USA: $3k → 14%SHELTERBOX USA: $1k → 9%International Institute: $4k → 21%MCCLINDEN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $3k → 19%International Institute: $4k → 21%International Institute: $4k → 21%DEFENDERS OF CHILDREN: $500 → 11%SINGLETON MOMS: $3k → 11%Welcome to America Project: $200 → 11%Welcome To America Project: $25k → 11%WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT: $3k → 11%Welcome to America Project: $2k → 11%Foster Your Future: $5k → 11%Foster Your Future: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$554k · 46 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
79

Total granted

$554k
$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+5%

Still filing today

41%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VB
    VALLEY BEIT MIDRASH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +231%
  • HI
    HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +58%
  • PA
    Prescott Area Shelter Services Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • OPEN ARMS HOME FOR CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +5%
  • AJ
    AZ Jews For Justice
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • VN
    Valencia Newcomers School
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
4
Jewish Federation of Southern Arizona

Jewish philanthropies of southern arizona (jpsa) is committed to achieving the full potential of jewish philanthropy, now and for future generations. comprised of jewish federation of southern arizona (jfsa or federation) and jewish…

Philanthropy
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
7
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
8
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
9
Jewish Family Service

Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…

Human Services
10
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
11
St Mary's Food Bank Alliance

Bridging the gap for arizona communities with nourishment for today and hope for tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
12
Yad Ezra V'shulamit

Yad ezra v'shulamit's mission is to provide over 300,000 people in israel with food and basic supplies for those living in poverty by distributing 12,000 weekly food baskets. with a focus on children we try to ensure that hundreds of…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise - Greater Phoenix; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/46
Grantees still filing
33/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YATOM: $35,000 · OtherYATOMGESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC: $26,500 · OtherGESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $20,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherSCUCC: $16,040 · Other+112 more: $321,774 · Other+112 moreVALLEY BEIT MIDRASH: $80,000 · EducationVALLEY BEIT M…ACCEL: $5,000 · EducationACCELTHE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT: $30,200 · Human ServicesTHE WELCOM…INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $12,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATIO…FOSTER YOUR FUTURE: $8,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER YOU…OPEN ARMS HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS …SHELTERBOX USA INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX…MCLINDON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE SINGLETONS: $2,500 · Human Services+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $50,000 · International+3 more: $3,541 · InternationalPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc: $42,500 · Housing & ShelterPARTNERS FOR PETS HUMANE SOCIETY: $27,000 · AnimalsTREEHOUSE WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $2,450 · Animals+1 more: $500 · AnimalsFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX: $12,036 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $500 · Religion
Other$439,814Education$85,000Human Services$65,700International$53,541Housing & Shelter$42,500Animals$29,950Religion$12,536

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY BEIT MIDRASH: $80,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc: $42,500 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTHE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT: $30,200 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPARTNERS FOR PETS HUMANE SOCIETY: $27,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC: $26,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX: $12,036 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER YOUR FUTURE: $8,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $6,040 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Jewish Historical Society: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN ARMS HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetACCEL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoothills Food Bank: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHEN ON THE STREET INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJUST STRAYS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 95% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY: $2,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMCLINDON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE SINGLETONS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPhoenix Chamber Music Society: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTREEHOUSE WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $2,450 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSE: $2,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK THEATRE TROUPE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMATTHEW'S CROSSING: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $1,041 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIG DEEP: $1,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTTSDALE COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $908 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEFENDERS OF CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VALLEY BEIT MIDRASH ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
  • Who funds Prescott Area Shelter Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR PETS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER YOUR FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Jewish Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCEL ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Food Bank ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ34.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · The Bozena And Josef Zelenda Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Jess and Sheila Schwartz Family Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Jewish Community Association of Greater Phoenix · William & Ruth Pendleton Memorial Fund US Bank National Association · Friedel Family Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Sundt Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph & May Winston Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph & May Winston Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph & May Winston Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joseph & May Winston Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph & May Winston’s filings →

More from the funding graph