Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph and Martha Melohn Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$201kPhilanthropy$85kHealth$30kHuman Services$15kFood & Nutrition$4kEducation$4kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL CHAIM$1,400
CONG ADAS YEREIM$500
BAIS MEDRASH OHR CHAIM$500
Individual grant recipient$500
WESTSIDE KOLLEL$500
YESHIVA BAIS MIKROH$500
Individual grant recipient$400
CONG ZICHRON MORDCHAI SHLOMO$300
KUPATH RAMBAHN KOLEL POLIN$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $3k → 6%YAD CHAYA INC: $5k → 13%YAD CHAYA INC: $5k → 13%AVIGDOR'S HELPING HAND: $180 → 13%HILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $180 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 27 repeat orgs$783k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
72

Total granted

$1.2M
$781k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+14%

Still filing today

22%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +102%
  • YO
    YESHIVA OHAVEI TORAH OF RIVERDALE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $28k · revenue +9%
  • YC
    YAD CHAYA INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • HE
    HATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $180k · revenue ×141
  • AF
    American Friends of Ramot Torah Schools
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -39%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
4
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
5
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
6
Yeshivas Nachlas Bnei Shimon

To provide financial assistance to jewish educational and charitable causes.

International
7
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
8
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
9
Yeshiva Gedolah Rabbinical College Inc

Provide college level education and extensive background of jewish law and talmudic studies and rabbinical ordination.

Education
10
Yeshiva Tiferes Boruch

A jewish secondary school which seeks to inculcate its students with high character and religious values to produce future religious leaders

—
11
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
12
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Ktana of Passaic; the most unlike its peers is Our Place Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $251,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONG MASORES HACHINUCH - YAD SHLOIMA ZALMAN: $175,000 · OtherCONG MASORES HACHINUCH - YAD SHLOIMA ZALMANGATEWAYS: $155,000 · OtherGATEWAYSWEST SIDE KOLLEL: $152,800 · OtherWEST SIDE KOLLELCONGREGATION TIFERES TZVI: $113,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TIFERES TZVIYESHIVA KETANA OF MANHATTAN: $105,000 · OtherYESHIVA KETANA OF MANHATTANYESHIVA SHAAR HATORAH INC: $100,000 · OtherYESHIVA SHAAR HATORAH INCIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $98,000 · OtherAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICACONGREGATION MASORES HACHINUCH INC: $75,000 · OtherBETH JACOB OF LOWER EAST SIDE: $61,500 · Other+77 more: $318,356 · Other+77 moreHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC: $180,000 · HealthHATZOLAH EM…BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $30,050 · HealthBIKUR CHOLI…+1 more: $2,500 · HealthAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $100,180 · EducationAmerican F…THE OJC FUND: $75,000 · EducationTHE OJC FU…YESHIVA OHAVEI TORAH OF RIVERDALE INC: $28,000 · EducationYESHIVA OH…+1 more: $3,500 · EducationYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $25,000 · ReligionZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $1,800 · Religion+2 more: $1,460 · ReligionYAD CHAYA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $3,000 · Human Services+2 more: $360 · Human ServicesDONORS FUND INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyOUR PLACE INC: $4,100 · Youth DevelopmentCentral Fund of Israel: $300 · International
Other$1,705,156Health$212,550Education$206,680Religion$28,260Human Services$13,360Philanthropy$10,000Youth Development$4,100International$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $100,180 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $98,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OJC FUND: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $30,050 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetYESHIVA OHAVEI TORAH OF RIVERDALE INC: $28,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAD CHAYA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHINENI INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $4,100 over 2y, 16% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Side Hatzoloh: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA HAR TORAH: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RABBI DR LEO JUNG MEMORIAL FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $860 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Ramot Torah Schools ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OHAVEI TORAH OF RIVERDALE INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC ↗
  • Who funds YAD CHAYA INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HINENI INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY47× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Joseph and Martha Melohn Tzedaka Fund · The Ohr Hakotel Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Yale Fishman Family Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph and Martha Melohn Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph and Martha Melohn Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joseph and Martha Melohn Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Joseph and Martha Melohn Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph and Martha Melohn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph