Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph and Karen Krantz Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$256k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$666kHealth$455kFood & Nutrition$127kHousing & Shelter$68kCommunity Improvement$68kArts & Culture$60kHuman Services$59kAnimals$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICINE$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ENDOWMENT$50,000
MICHIGAN MEDICINE PATIENT EXP$21,430
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MARCHING BAND$20,000
OUR LADY OF PEACE ST VINCENT DE PAUL$20,000
SVSU FOUNDATION$15,000
BRIAN'S HOUSE$10,000
HARBOR SPRINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY$5,000
NATE AND MARY IDA DOAN SANTA HOUSE$3,050
ELE'S PLACE$1,000
GREAT LAKES DREAM CENTER$640
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SHELTER HOUSE: $962 → 9%SHELTERHOUSE: $3k → 9%RACHEL SOVEREIGN MEMORIAL HOME: $18k → 14%HOUSE BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD: $466 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 21 repeat orgs$228k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
23

Total granted

$1.3M
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+26%

Still filing today

19%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICINE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $310k
  • CM
    CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $190k
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2021–2022 · $124k · revenue +96% · 37% of their budget

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • CC
    CAN COUNCIL BAY COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • RS
    RACHEL SOVEREIGN MEMORIAL HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $18k · revenue +102%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
2
Caring House Inc

To promote a violence free atmosphere from domestic and sexual violence in which survivors can recognize their options to have the opportunity to continue living violence free and regain their sense of self-worth; to educate and raise…

Human Services
3
Humane Society & Animal Rescue of Muskegon County

To shelter and find forever homes for homeless dogs and cats.

Animals
4
South Oakland Shelter

Lighthouse mi endeavors to build equitable communities and alleviate poverty in partnership with and in service to individuals, families, and organizations.

Housing & Shelter
5
Humane Society of Saginaw County Incorporated

The Betterment of the lives of stray, owned and abandoned companion animals in Saginaw County, MI. Our county has over 20,000 households living below the federal poverty guidelines that own at least one pet. We are their safety net. We…

Animals
6
Humane Society of Midland County

Our mission is to provide an adoption-friendly animal shelter that will unify the community toward a common goal of responsible animal treatment and increased animal adoptions to design and incorporate new education and public programs…

—
7
Macomb County Humane Society

Provide care for homeless/abused animals

Animals
8
Gw Homeless Services of Northern Michigan Inc

The mission of gw homeless services of northern michigan, inc is to provide safe, supportive shelter to individuals experiencing homelessness.the 2023 990 was for 10/1-12/31/23 due to an accounting period change.

Human Services
9
Humane Society of South Central Mi

Animal shelter - provide a safe haven for animals without homes.

Animals
10
Homeless Action Network of Detroit

Our mission is to increase awareness of the problems of people who are homeless and the development and carrying out of strategies to create permanent solutions to homelessness in our community.

Human Services
11
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
12
Habitat for Humanity of Lapeer - Tuscola

To eliminate sub-standard housing and homelessness from lapeer county.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Council On Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault; the most unlike its peers is Bay Veterans Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICINE: $310,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICINECENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $190,000 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYUniversity of Michigan: $123,658 · OtherUniversity of MichiganUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ENDOWMENT: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ENDOWMENTSVSU: $75,000 · OtherBRIAN'S HOUSE: $63,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MARCHING BAND: $60,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PEACE ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $57,000 · OtherHARBOR SPRINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $55,000 · Other+29 more: $398,658 · Other+29 moreFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $65,000 · Food & NutritionRACHEL SOVEREIGN MEMORIAL HOME: $18,252 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $5,000 · Human ServicesHIDDEN HARVEST: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT: $3,962 · Human Services+1 more: $466 · Human ServicesBAY VETERANS FOUNDATION: $12,900 · PhilanthropyHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY: $5,000 · AnimalsAMAZING GRACE ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 · AnimalsRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterELE'S PLACE INC: $2,029 · Youth Development
Other$1,432,316Food & Nutrition$65,000Human Services$32,680Philanthropy$12,900Animals$5,500Housing & Shelter$5,000Youth Development$2,029

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $123,658 over 2y, 37% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRACHEL SOVEREIGN MEMORIAL HOME: $18,252 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBAY VETERANS FOUNDATION: $12,900 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIDDEN HARVEST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT: $3,962 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $2,029 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD: $466 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds RACHEL SOVEREIGN MEMORIAL HOME ↗
  • Who funds BAY VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
  • Who funds NATE AND MARY IDA DOAN SANTA HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Gougeon Employees Foundation · Bay Area Community Foundation · Nickless Family Charitable Foundation · Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph and Karen Krantz Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph and Karen Krantz Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joseph and Karen Krantz Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Joseph and Karen Krantz Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph and Karen Krantz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph