Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Joseph & Evelyn Pertusati Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$795k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$2.0MHuman Services$1.8MHousing & Shelter$453kYouth Development$56kInternational$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$55,648
Median grant
3
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES$63,592
VILLA SCALABRINI RETIREMENT CENTER$63,592
HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$55,648
LOS ANGELES ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL FDN$55,648
SCRIPPS FOUNDATION$55,648
HOSPITALLER FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA$55,648
VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$55,648
MIDNIGHT MISSION$55,648
FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME$55,648
CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC$55,648
THE SALVATION ARMY$55,648
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$55,648
PROVIDENCE SAINT JOSEPH FOUNDATION$55,648
BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC$55,648
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $963k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $56k → 13%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $60k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $60k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $56k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $48k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $48k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $47k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $47k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $44k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $44k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $60k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $60k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $56k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $48k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $48k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $47k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $47k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $44k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $44k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 14 repeat orgs$397k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$6.0M
$397k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
0%

Still filing today

21%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $397k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MIDNIGHT MISSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $453k · revenue +43%
  • BI
    BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $453k · revenue +146%
  • VP
    VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $398k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    one grant, 2025 · $64k · revenue 0%
  • TC
    THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2025 · $56k · revenue 0%
  • TH
    THE HOSPITALLER FOUNDATION OF CALIF INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $56k · revenue +282%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Barlow Respiratory Hospital

A not-for-profit, long-term acute care specialty healthcare organization is to improve the quality of life for patients with respiratory and other diseases that may require prolonged acute hospitalization of specialized treatment.

Health
4
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
6
Pih Health Whittier Hospital

Mission: we provide high quality healthcare without discrimination, and contribute to the health and well-being of our communities in an ethical, safe, and fiscally prudent manner in recognition of our charitable purpose.

Health
7
Valley Children's Healthcare

To support health care activities and programs for the benefit of, and to provide health care services to, children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin, and to enhance the…

Health
8
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
9
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

10
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
11
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

12
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Presbyterian Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Midnight Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VILLA SCALABRINI RETIREMENT CENTER — $518,222 · OtherVILLA SCALABRINI RETIREMENT CENTERCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS — $454,630 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOSTHE SALVATION ARMY — $453,447 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSCRIPPS FOUNDATION — $453,447 · OtherSCRIPPS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $445,208 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $397,799 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $397,799 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOSPITALLER FOUNDATION OF — $397,799 · OtherHOSPITALLER FOUNDATION OFCASA RIPOSO DI FERRARIS — $397,799 · OtherCASA RIPOSO DI FERRARISCEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN — $397,799 · OtherCEDARS HOME FOR CHILDRENIndividual grant recipient — $397,799 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+4 more — $222,592 · OtherTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $453,447 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MIS…BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC — $453,447 · Human ServicesBRAILLE INSTITUT…THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $55,648 · Human ServicesTHE CEDARS HOME …VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL — $397,799 · HealthVALLEY PR…Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $63,592 · HealthChildren'…PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA — $55,648 · HealthPROVIDENC…HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES — $55,648 · HealthHUNTINGTO…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $55,648 · Philanthropy
Other$4,934,340Human Services$962,542Health$572,687Philanthropy$55,648

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $453,447 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC — $453,447 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL — $397,799 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $63,592 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $55,648 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $55,648 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT MISSION
  • Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA
  • Who funds THE HOSPITALLER FOUNDATION OF CALIF INC
  • Who funds VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Joseph & Evelyn Pertusati Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph