Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jordan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$118kArts & Culture$99kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kHealth$51kEducation$21kCommunity Improvement$17kEnvironment$11kCivil Rights$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$840k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$19,486
SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY$15,500
SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY$12,000
CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER$500
LEMON BAY SUNRISE ROTARY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $40k → 14%HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $36k → 14%HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $32k → 14%HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $19k → 14%HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $18k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $17k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $16k → 14%SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY: $16k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $13k → 14%SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY: $12k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $11k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $10k → 14%SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY: $10k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $9k → 14%SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $9k → 14%SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $9k → 14%SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $8k → 14%SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $7k → 14%SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 14%SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 14%SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 14%FCVA SAEGERTOWN LITTLE LEAGUE: $6k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $5k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $5k → 14%SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 14%SAEGERTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $4k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $4k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $4k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $4k → 14%SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY: $3k → 14%SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $3k → 14%SAEGERTOWN WOMEN'S IMPROVEMENT CLUB: $3k → 14%SAEGERTOWN WOMEN'S IMPROVEMENT CLUB: $3k → 14%SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $3k → 14%SAEGERTOWN WOMEN'S IMPROVEMENT CLUB: $2k → 14%SAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 14%SAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 14%SAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 14%SAEGERTOWN BOROUGH: $2k → 14%SAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 14%SAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 14%SAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$436k · 10 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$436k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+10%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterArts & CultureEducationHealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +68%
  • SA
    SAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +48%
  • FC
    FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLINC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • FS
    FCVA SAEGERTOWN LITTLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • SP
    SAEGERTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • HO
    Hospice of Crawford County Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saxeville-Springwater Vol Fire Engine Co

The Saxeville-Springwater Volunteer Fire Department was established in 1957, providing Fire and Rescue coverage to portions of the towns of Saxeville, Springwater and Mount Morris in Waushara County Wisconsin. Rural coverage area consists…

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Seelyville Fire Company

Provides volunteer fire protection and rescue services to the seelyville, pa and surrounding area.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Erie Marsh Conservation Foundation
Environment
4
Fredericktown Area Historical Society

Historical society for fredericktown ohio

Arts & Culture
5
Saxonburg Volunteer Fire Company

Provide community with Fire and Ambulance service

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Sag Harbor Fire Department Inc

To provide fire protection services

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Erie Yacht Club

The purposes of the erie yacht club are to maintain, develop, and enlarge the facilities for yachting and boating, to encourage and develop yachting and other aquatic sports, to promote social recreational activities connected therewith,…

8
Frazeysburg Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Provide emergency medical services and fire runs Training of volunteer EMS and fire personnel maintenance and repair of equipment.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Mercer County Historical Society Inc

The mission of the mercer county historical society is to collect and preserve artifacts, manuscripts, published materials and records relating to mercer county's pre-history and history and use these to increase public awareness and…

10
Schaefferstown Emergency Medical Services Inc

Provide emergency medical care and ambulance service to Heidelberg Township, PA and surrounding areas.

Health
11
Eagleswood Fire Company No 1 Inc

Provide full fire protection and related emergency service primarily to the residents of eagleswood township.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Shavertown Volunteer Fire Co

Provide volunteer fire fighting and other related emergency services for Shavertown and the Back Mountain Regional Community.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hamot Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hospice of Crawford County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $249,588 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+7 more — $32,546 · Other+7 moreTHE SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $55,440 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE SAEGERTOWN…HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthHAMOT HEALTH…SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY — $40,466 · Arts & CultureSAEGERTOWN…SAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $16,542 · EducationCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC — $2,500 · EnvironmentERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 · PhilanthropyENGLEWOOD SAILING ASSOCIATION INC — $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$282,134Public Safety & Disaster$55,440Health$50,000Arts & Culture$40,466Education$16,542Environment$2,500Philanthropy$500Recreation & Sports$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $55,440 over 7y, 11% of budgetHAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY — $40,466 over 3y, 14% of budgetSAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $16,542 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRENCH CREEK VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLINC — $1,536 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHospice of Crawford County Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGLEWOOD SAILING ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY
  • Who funds SAEGERTOWN AREA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC
  • Who funds FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLINC
  • Who funds Hospice of Crawford County Inc
  • Who funds ERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ENGLEWOOD SAILING ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jordan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jordan Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jordan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph