Skip to content
Jonas Ehrlich Charitable Foundation II Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jonas Ehrlich Charitable Foundation II Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$290k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.9MEducation$82kHealth$52kHuman Services$22kInternational$18kYouth Development$9kEnvironment$2kPhilanthropy$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$1,800
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERKOS L'INYONEI CHINUCH$77,000
TZIVOS HASHEM$49,005
CHABAD OF BUSHWICK$46,000
Individual grant recipient$26,800
CHABAD OF WILMINGTON NC INC$18,000
NISONS TABLE SCHOOL$14,860
NESHAMOS INC$12,000
Individual grant recipient$5,550
THE POSTVILLE SHUL$5,000
YALDEI SHLUCHEI HAREBBE$3,600
CHABAD OF WEST BOCA RATON$2,860
CHABAD OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE CORP$2,500
BAIS CHABAD OF KALKASKA INC$2,500
CHASSIDUS OF CENTRAL SOUTH FL$2,500
UNITED JEWISH CHILDREN FUND$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NISONS TABLE SCHOOL: $15k → 13%CHABAD OF BUSHWICK: $46k → 20%THE POSTVILLE SHUL: $5k → 12%BAIS HAKNEEESE HAGRA: $5k → 8%CHABAD OF WILMINGTON NC INC: $18k → 12%NISONS TABLE SCHOOL: $15k → 13%CONGREGATION ACHDUS YISRAEL: $6k → 14%CHABAD OF BUSHWICK: $7k → 20%THE POSTVILLE SHUL: $5k → 12%NISONS TABLE SCHOOL: $14k → 13%CHABAD OF BUSHWICK: $6k → 20%NISONS TABLE SCHOOL: $13k → 13%CHABAD OF BUSHWICK: $6k → 20%NISONS TABLE SCHOOL: $10k → 13%CHABAD OF BUSHWICK: $6k → 20%NISONS TABLE SCHOOL: $10k → 13%VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS - PER SCHEDUL: $400k → 20%VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS - PER SCHEDUL: $216k → 20%CHABAD LUBAVITCH: $72k → 20%TZIVOS HASHEM: $53k → 20%TZIVOS HASHEM: $49k → 20%TZIVOS HASHEM: $49k → 20%TZIVOS HASHEM: $46k → 20%TZIVOS HASHEM: $42k → 20%TZIVOS HASHEM: $42k → 20%MACHON L'YAHADUS: $27k → 20%MACHON L'YAHADUS: $26k → 20%MACHON L'YAHADUS: $23k → 20%MACHON L'YAHADUS: $19k → 20%MACHON L'YAHADUS: $18k → 20%CHABAD LUBAVITCH: $16k → 20%MACHON L'YAHADUS: $11k → 20%CHEVRA OF JEWISH WAR HEROES FUND: $10k → 20%HAMESIVTA: $10k → 20%CHABAD LUBAVITCH: $7k → 20%INTEGRITY CARE SERVICES INC: $40k → 20%MERKOS L'INYONEI CHINUCH: $77k → 20%MERKOS L'INYONEI CHINUCH: $77k → 20%MERKOS L'INYONEI CHINUCH: $77k → 20%MERKOS L'INYONEI CHINUCH: $77k → 20%MERKOS L'INYONEI CHINUCH: $77k → 20%MERKOS L'INYONEI CHINUCH: $72k → 20%NESHAMOS INC: $12k → 20%CHABAD OF STARRET CITY: $57k → 20%CONGREGATION ANSHEI SFARD: $50k → 20%CHABAD OF STARRET CITY: $50k → 20%CHABAD OF STARRET CITY: $44k → 20%CHABAD OF STARRET CITY: $35k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
MI
NY
IA
PA
RI
CA
CO
AR
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 24 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
20

Total granted

$2.0M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+23%

Still filing today

17%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    Yaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +88%
  • YT
    YAGDIL TORAH INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +55%
  • IM
    IGGUD MENAHALEI YESHIVOS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CA
    CONGREGATION ANSHEI SFARD
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • IC
    INTEGRITY CARE SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue -3%
  • CO
    CHEVRA OF JEWISH WAR HEROES FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
4
Bnei Moshe
Philanthropy
5
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
6
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
7
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
10
Chassidus in English Inc

Translation of classic chassidic texts and the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbes,and the composition of works designed to make Judaism and Chassidism relevant to readers today.

Religion
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
Bais Medrash Lmorim

To spread Jewish Education

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yagdil Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Big Sister Mentoring Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS - PER SCHEDUL: $616,118 · OtherVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS - PER SCHEDULMERKOS LINYONEI CHINUCH INC: $457,000 · OtherMERKOS LINYONEI CHINUCH INCTZIVOS HASHEM: $280,205 · OtherTZIVOS HASHEMCHABAD OF STARRET CITY: $186,000 · OtherCHABAD OF STARRET CITYIndividual grant recipient: $123,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD LUBAVITCH: $101,896 · OtherNISONS TABLE SCHOOL: $77,340 · OtherCHABAD OF BUSHWICK INC: $71,000 · Other+40 more: $207,870 · Other+40 moreINTEGRITY CARE SERVICES INC: $40,000 · HealthNeshamos Inc: $12,000 · HealthYAGDIL TORAH INC: $9,520 · ReligionIGGUD MENAHALEI YESHIVOS INC: $6,000 · ReligionBAIS CHABAD OF KALKASKA INC: $2,500 · ReligionONLINE SMICHA: $2,000 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $14,580 · PhilanthropyBig Sister Mentoring Program Inc: $4,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF CHABAD VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS INC: $1,800 · InternationalBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $1,575 · Environment
Other$2,120,729Health$52,000Religion$20,520Philanthropy$14,580Education$4,500International$1,800Environment$1,575

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTEGRITY CARE SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $14,580 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYAGDIL TORAH INC: $9,520 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetIGGUD MENAHALEI YESHIVOS INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBig Sister Mentoring Program Inc: $4,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHABAD VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $1,575 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Avner Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTEGRITY CARE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Yaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization ↗
  • Who funds Neshamos Inc ↗
  • Who funds YAGDIL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds IGGUD MENAHALEI YESHIVOS INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Sister Mentoring Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAIS CHABAD OF KALKASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds ONLINE SMICHA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nash Charity Foundati…The Ojc FundJla Charitable Founda…Lets Make It Happen N…Keren Hachomesh IncKolel Torah IncJewish Communal FundBarber Family Foundat…Crain-Maling Foundati…United Jewish Appeal-…Krinsky Foundation IncCongregation Bh Inc
Nash Charity Foundation IncNJ30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nash Charity Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jla Charitable Foundation · Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc · Keren Hachomesh Inc · Kolel Torah Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Barber Family Foundation · Crain-Maling Foundation · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Krinsky Foundation Inc · Congregation Bh Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jonas Ehrlich Charitable Foundation II Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jonas Ehrlich Charitable Foundation II Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jonas Ehrlich Charitable Foundation II Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jonas Ehrlich Charitable Foundation II Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jonas Ehrlich Charitable Foundation II’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home