Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jolly Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$850
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$5kReligion$4kCivil Rights$3kHuman Services$1kInternational$1kCrime & Legal$880Education$800Housing & Shelter$495Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$400
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIKH COALITION$850
ETERNAL CHARITABLE$800
WOUNDED WARRIORS$430
THE CONSERVATION FUND$400
Individual grant recipient$400
V FOUNDATION$400
ASPCA$400
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$400
ST JUDE HOSPITAL$30
SOUTHERN POWERTY LAW CENTRE$30
SMILE TRAIN$30
Individual grant recipient$30
OPERATION HOME FRONT$30
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SCOPE FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NV
NJ
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9k · 10 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +117% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$9k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
+32%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SIKH COALITION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +117%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $990 · revenue +19%
  • OH
    OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $900 · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SF
    SCOPE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • SY
    SIKH YOUTH ASSSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • SS
    SIKH SOCIETY OF FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Satyagraha Foundation
Religion
2
Dr Samin Sharma Family Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Sikh Family Center

Sikh family center is a nonprofit organization in the u.s. that promotes community well-being with a particular focus on gender justice. we provide trauma-centered resources for victim-survivors of violence while organizing to change the…

Human Services
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Singh Family Foundation Washington
Philanthropy
6
Sanjay Shah Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Save the Children Federation Inc

Save the children is an international nonprofit children's relief and development organization. our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.

International
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
11
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
12
Rakshak Foundation

Rakshak Foundation creates awareness domestically and internationally about the rights and responsibilities of citizens towards the society and the state. Rakshak engages in and supports social and scientific research on public policy and…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scope Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sikh Foundation of Virginia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SIKH YOUTH ASSSOCIATION — $1,500 · OtherSIKH YOUTH ASSSOCIATIONWOUNDED WARRIORS — $1,270 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORSSIKH SOCIETY OF FLORIDA INC — $1,000 · OtherSIKH SOCIETY OF FLORIDA INCSMILE TRAIN INC — $990 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCST JUDE HOSPITAL — $885 · OtherST JUDE HOSPITALSOUTHERN POWERTY LAW CENTRE — $880 · OtherSOUTHERN POWERTY LAW CENTREETERNAL CHARITABLE — $800 · OtherETERNAL CHARITABLEKALGIDHAR SOCIETY OF AKAL ACA — $700 · OtherKALGIDHAR SOCIETY OF AKAL ACAIndividual grant recipient — $500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $495 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $400 · Other+7 more — $1,291 · Other+7 moreTHE SIKH COALITION — $2,500 · Civil RightsTHE SIKH COALIT…SCOPE FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesSCOPE FOUNDA…OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $900 · Community ImprovementEDU-GIRLS INC — $420 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $400 · InternationalTHE V FOUNDATION — $400 · HealthTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $400 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $400 · Animals
Other$10,711Civil Rights$2,500Human Services$2,000Community Improvement$900International$820Health$400Environment$400Animals$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SIKH COALITION — $2,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $990 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEDU-GIRLS INC — $420 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SIKH COALITION
  • Who funds SCOPE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
  • Who funds EDU-GIRLS INC
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds SIKH FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jolly Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph