Skip to content

· Private foundation

Johnson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$379k
Granted FY2020
15
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$246kHealth$126kPhilanthropy$94kInternational$77kReligion$7kHuman Services$7kAnimals$1kFood & Nutrition$1k
02FY2020 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k11 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $294k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$200,000
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$94,091
KIDS AROUND THE WORLD$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$15,000
RAINBOW HOSPICE CARE$8,500
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$5,000
NORTH BEND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
CURE EPILEPSY$5,000
OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL$2,000
SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN$1,100
MADISON COLLEGE$1,064
LAKE MILLS MORAVIAN CHURCH$1,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY INC$600
AMERICAN FAMILY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100
LAKE MILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LAKE MILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%LAKE MILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%LAKE MILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%LAKE MILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MA
OR
CA
NE
MO
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$197k · 13 repeat orgs$228k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$197k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+14%

Still filing today

54%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KA
    KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $69k · revenue +86%
  • RH
    RAINBOW HOSPICE CARE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue +90%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $26k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • MA
    MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • CF
    CURE FOR EPILEPSY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • LU
    LAKELAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
2
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
3
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation

To support scientific research within the uw-madison community by providing financial support, actively managing assets, and moving innovations to the marketplace for a financial return and global impact.

Education
6
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
7
University of Iowa Research Foundation

The university of iowa research foundation's (uirf) mission is to: advance, develop, increase and extend the progress of science and useful arts through encouraging and assisting investigation, research and education at the state…

—
8
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
9
University of Minnesota Foundation

A non-profit organization with the sole purpose of supporting the university of minnesota with a mission to connect passion with possibility, inspire generosity, and support greatness at the university of minnesota.

Education
10
Des Moines University Osteopathic Medical Center

To improve lives in our global community by educating diverse groups of highly competent and compassionate health professionals.

Education
11
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
12
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Nebraska Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Western Poultry Scholarship & Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $25,900 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION+3 more: $4,890 · EducationFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $94,091 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENT…MAYO CLINIC: $40,500 · HealthMAYO CLINICSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $24,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITAL…Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $20,000 · HealthCitizens United f…RAINBOW HOSPICE CARE INC: $35,475 · OtherRAINBOW HOSPICE…MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10,789 · OtherMADISON AREA TE…OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 · OtherOPTIMIST INTERN…NORTH BEND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherNORTH BEND PRES…CURE FOR EPILEPSY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherCURE FOR EPILEP…REACHING OUT RESPITE CENTER: $3,000 · OtherBENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Other+10 more: $6,863 · Other+10 moreKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $69,480 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS AROUND TH…HUMANE SOCIETY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY INC: $1,450 · AnimalsSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $1,100 · Food & NutritionLAKE MILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $400 · Human Services
Education$230,790Community Improvement$94,091Health$84,500Other$78,127Youth Development$69,480Animals$1,450Food & Nutrition$1,100Human Services$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $94,091 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $69,480 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $40,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW HOSPICE CARE INC: $35,475 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $25,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY INC: $1,450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN POULTRY SCHOLARSHIP & RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLAKE MILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW HOSPICE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy ↗
  • Who funds LAKELAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN POULTRY SCHOLARSHIP & RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAKE MILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Lake Mills Rotary Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johnson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johnson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Johnson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph