Skip to content
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service excellence, diversity and a commitment to patient safety.

$101M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$79M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$342MEducation$45k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,425,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC$79,180,882
ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$11,842,655
WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC$8,425,500
ALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM INC$780,000
JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC$750,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FLORIDA PTA DBA NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY PTA: $10k → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $79.2M → 19%FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $93k → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $68.1M → 19%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $61.9M → 19%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $39.4M → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $11.9M → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $11.0M → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $10.6M → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INC: $9.1M → 19%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $8.4M → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INC: $6.6M → 19%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $5.0M → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM: $3.6M → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2.1M → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $900k → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $800k → 19%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVIICES: $758k → 19%KIDS HOME CARE INC: $467k → 19%KIDS HOME CARE INC: $394k → 19%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $35k → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $11.8M → 19%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $8.4M → 19%ALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $780k → 19%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $750k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$341M · 5 repeat orgs$888k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$341M
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+96%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $249M · revenue +54% · 49% of their budget
  • AC
    ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $61M · revenue +38% · 64% of their budget
  • WC
    WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $22M · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • ME
    MIAMI-DADE ELDERLY SERVICES
    one grant, 2019 · $93k
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue +25%
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY PTAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation Inc

Johns hopkins all children's foundation, inc. supports the mission of johns hopkins all children's hospital, inc., all children's health system, inc., all children's research institute, inc. and other 501(c)(3) organizations through…

Health
2
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
3
Johns Hopkins Medical Services Corporation

Johns hopkins medical services corporation provides healthcare services to the population of the us family health plan (usfhp).

Health
4
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
5
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
6
Johns Hopkins Home Care Group Inc

Performance of managerial functions supporting the furtherance of tax-exempt missions of johns hopkins home health services, inc., johns hopkins pharmaquip, inc., and johns hopkins pediatrics at home, inc.

—
7
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
8
Hackensack Specialty Care Associates Pc

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

Health
9
Johns Hopkins Hospital Endowment Fund Inc

The johns hopkins hospital endowment fund, inc. holds and manages the endowment and certain other funds which benefit certain affiliates.

Health
10
Johns Hopkins Home Health Services Inc

Provision of home health services including community outreach programs with an emphasis on detection and prevention of common illnesses and disease.

Health
11
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
12
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians Inc

Johns hopkins community physicians, inc (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is All Children's Health System Inc; the most unlike its peers is North Shore Elementary Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $249,302,210 · OtherPEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INCWEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $21,801,735 · OtherWEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC+2 more: $102,744 · OtherALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $61,020,852 · HealthALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH…KIDS HOME CARE INC: $6,520,884 · HealthKIDS HOME CARE INCALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2,480,000 · Health+1 more: $750,000 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $35,241 · Education
Other$271,206,689Health$70,771,736Education$35,241

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $249,302,210 over 5y, 49% of budgetALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $61,020,852 over 6y, 64% of budgetWEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $21,801,735 over 3y, 19% of budgetKIDS HOME CARE INC: $6,520,884 over 3y, 23% of budgetALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2,480,000 over 3y, 98% of budgetHOWARD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $750,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $35,241 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ELEMENTARY PTA: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Johns Hopkins All Chi…
Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation IncMD15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home