Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Wesley Village II Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$1.0MReligion$136kRecreation & Sports$127kFood & Nutrition$65kEducation$65kYouth Development$48kHealth$22kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOROTHY FLINT 4H CAMP$100,638
Individual grant recipient$27,000
HALLOCKVILLE INC$25,000
TOWN OF RIVERHEAD$10,000
ST JOHN THE BAPTIST REGIONAL SCHOOL$7,500
ST ISADORE'S CHURCH$5,705
RAYNOR COUNTY DAY SCHOOL$5,384
MATTITUCK CUTCHOGUE SCHOOL DISTRICT$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SOUNDVIEW PREGNANCY ADVOCACY: $8k → 6%RAYNOR COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 7%CORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $41k → 16%PECONIC UNITED METHODIST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC: $1.0M → 17%OUTLAW STATE OF KIND: $5k → 14%WAVES BASEBALL: $4k → 7%RAYNOR COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 7%WAVES BASEBALL: $4k → 7%RAYNOR COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 7%RAYNOR COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 7%RAYNOR COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $3k → 7%WESTHAMPTON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8k → 7%NORTH FORK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $21k → 7%NORTH FORK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $8k → 7%NORTH FORK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 7%AG SOUND MEDIA - INSPIRATIONALS: $3k → 7%BIRTH RIGHT OF PECONIC: $12k → 7%MATTITUCK CUTCHOGUE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15k → 7%NORTH FORK UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $14k → 7%MARTY LYONS FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%ST JOHN THE BAPTIST REGIONAL SCHOOL: $8k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $42k → 7%NORTH FORK LACROSSE: $39k → 7%NORTH FORK LACROSSE: $27k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15k → 7%NORTH FORK LACROSSE: $10k → 7%NORTH FORK LACROSSE: $10k → 7%NORTH FORK LACROSSE: $5k → 7%NORTH FORK LACROSSE: $5k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 7%OLD COVE YATCH CLUB: $4k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 7%OPERATION INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 7%DOROTHY FLINT 4H CAMP: $101k → 7%DOROTHY FLINT 4H CAMP: $47k → 7%HALLOCKVILLE INC: $25k → 7%RIVERHEAD LITTLE LEAGUE: $14k → 7%TOWN OF RIVERHEAD: $10k → 7%SAINT JOHN PAUL II REGIONAL SCHOOL: $10k → 7%BREAD AND MORE INN: $10k → 7%ST ISADORE'S CHURCH: $6k → 7%HALLOCKVILLE INC: $5k → 7%BREAD AND MORE INN: $5k → 7%RIVERHEAD LITTLE LEAGUE: $4k → 7%RIVERHEAD LITTLE LEAGUE: $4k → 7%SAINT JOHN PAUL II REGIONAL SCHOOL: $3k → 7%BRANCHES OF LONG ISLAND: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$546k · 16 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
19

Total granted

$546k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
0%

Still filing today

19%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DF
    DOROTHY FLINT 4H CAMP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $147k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $96k
  • MP
    MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $92k

Funded once

  • PU
    PECONIC UNITED METHODIST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue 0% · 100% of their budget
  • CC
    CORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
    one grant, 2024 · $41k
  • OI
    OPERATION INTERNATIONAL LTD
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oceana Fire Association

The mission of the oceana fire association is to serve the community of oceana by dispelling fires and the protection of person and property.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Middle Island Volunteer Fire Department Inc

The Middle Island Fire Volunteer Fire Department, formed in 1948, is an organization that provides emergency fire and ambulance services to Middle Island and surrounding communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Beach Haven Volunteer Fire Co

The organization is a volunteer fire company responding to fires and emergency water rescue activities

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Monmouth Ocean Hospital Service Corporation

Providing Emergency on-site medical care. Company ceased operations on 4 1 2020.

—
5
Nassau Hook and Ladder Co No1 Inc

volunter firefighters

—
6
Orchard Beach Volunteer Fire Dept

Volunteer Fire Department

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Old Lyme Fire Department

operation of a volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Indian River Volunteer Fire Company Inc

The purpose of the company is to provide fire and rescue services in the oak orchard, riverdale and long neck areas of sussex county

—
9
Ionia Volunteer Fire Company Inc

The ionia volunteer fire company, inc. is organized to provide fire and emergency services to the residents of west bloomfield, new york.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Long Island Broncos Inc

To operate a youth football and cheerleading organization

—
11
East Moriches Hook & Ladder Co No 1 Inc

Provide Fire Protection Services

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Nassau Chemical & Hose Company No 1 of Valley Stream Ny Inc

Fire emergency response safety

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Fork United Soccer Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is Riverhead Little League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PECONIC UNITED METHODIST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC: $1,000,000 · Housing & ShelterPECONIC UNITED METHODIST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INCDOROTHY FLINT 4H CAMP: $147,338 · OtherDOROTHY FLINT 4H CAMPIndividual grant recipient: $95,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $92,000 · OtherMATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $41,000 · OtherCORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSIONNORTH FORK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $33,000 · OtherNORTH FORK UNITED METHODIST CHURCHRAYNOR COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $31,864 · OtherRAYNOR COUNTY DAY SCHOOL+22 more: $125,310 · Other+22 moreRIVERHEAD LITTLE LEAGUE: $28,700 · Youth DevelopmentNORTH FORK UNITED SOCCER CLUB INC: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentHALLOCKVILLE INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureOPERATION INTERNATIONAL LTD: $15,000 · HealthBIRTHRIGHT OF THE PECONIC INC: $12,000 · HealthThe Marty Lyons Foundation Inc: $2,500 · HealthBRANCHES LONG ISLAND INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementORIENT FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $1,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Housing & Shelter$1,000,000Other$566,012Youth Development$44,700Arts & Culture$30,000Health$29,500Community Improvement$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPECONIC UNITED METHODIST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetHALLOCKVILLE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRIVERHEAD LITTLE LEAGUE: $28,700 over 5y, 15% of budgetNORTH FORK UNITED SOCCER CLUB INC: $16,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetOPERATION INTERNATIONAL LTD: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF THE PECONIC INC: $12,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetOld Cove Yacht Club Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Marty Lyons Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORIENT FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PECONIC UNITED METHODIST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds HALLOCKVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERHEAD LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FORK UNITED SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION INTERNATIONAL LTD ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF THE PECONIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BRANCHES LONG ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Old Cove Yacht Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Marty Lyons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORIENT FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Wesley Village II Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Wesley Village II Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Wesley Village II Inc?

    Find your warmest path to John Wesley Village II Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Wesley Village II’s filings →

    More from the funding graph