Skip to content

· Public charity

John Taylor Babbitt Foundation Inc

Increase awareness about the prevalence of sudden cardiac death through donations of defibrillators and cpr training.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$218kScience & Tech$150kHuman Services$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kEducation$6kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $25,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $109,714 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $84,714 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$471k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORRISTOWN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GATEWAY FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$256k · 4 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$256k
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +3%
  • FF
    Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
    4× · 2021–2025 · $85k · revenue +32%
  • SC
    SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY - THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $53k
  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - DIVISION OF CARDIOLOGY
    one grant, 2017 · $38k
  • CE
    CHATHAM EMERGENCY SQUAD INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
St Joseph's Health System Subordinate Group Return

We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.

—
3
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Suburban Hospital Inc

Suburban hospital will deliver superior healthcare enhanced by technology, wellness education, research, and innovative partnerships with physicians, hospitals, the community, and the national institutes of health. mission: improving…

Health
6
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
7
Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital

Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…

Health
8
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
9
Centrastate Medical Center Inc

Centrastate medical center's mission is to enhance the health and well-being of our communities through the compassionate delivery of quality healthcare. please refer to the organization's community benefit statement included in schedule o.

Health
10
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
11
The Carle Foundation Hospital

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
12
The Valley Hospital Foundation Inc

The valley hospital foundation is the philanthropic component of valley health system. its primary function is to secure charitable contributions from individuals, corporations, foundations, and other funding entities, to manage those…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinitas Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sudden Cardiac Arrest Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $17,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNI…+1 more: $5,738 · EducationSTANFORD UNIVERSITY - THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $52,500 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY - THE LELAN…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - DIVISION OF CARDIOLOGY: $37,500 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - DIVI…CHATHAM EMERGENCY SQUAD INC: $7,500 · OtherCHATHAM EMERGENCY SQUAD INCCHATHAM TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6,840 · OtherCHATHAM TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMEN…OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $5,100 · OtherFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $85,000 · HealthFoundation for Morristown Medi…TRINITAS FOUNDATION: $10,607 · HealthTRINITAS FOUNDATIONSUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthSUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST FOUNDATI…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EASTERN UNION COUNTY: $5,493 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE PATAPSCO VALLEY STATE PARK LTD: $5,069 · Arts & Culture
Education$173,238Other$109,440Health$105,607Human Services$5,493Arts & Culture$5,069

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITAS FOUNDATION: $10,607 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCHATHAM EMERGENCY SQUAD INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CLARKE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF CLARKE SCHOOLS FOR HEARING AND SPEECH: $5,738 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EASTERN UNION COUNTY: $5,493 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PATAPSCO VALLEY STATE PARK LTD: $5,069 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Taylor Babbitt Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Taylor Babbitt Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Clarke School for the Deaf Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech: 1% of income from government
  • Chatham Emergency Squad Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John Taylor Babbitt Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to John Taylor Babbitt Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John Taylor Babbitt’s filings →

More from the funding graph