Skip to content

· Private foundation

JOHN STEELMAN and ELIZABETH STEELMAN Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$264kRecreation & Sports$3kReligion$2kHuman Services$2kHealth$2kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$87k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$16,000
STOCKTON UNIVERSITY$13,476
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$7,500
ATLANTIC CAPE COMM COLL$3,948
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 28% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 6%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 22%VASSAR COLLEGE: $5k → 9%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%UNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $8k → 16%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 20%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%THOMAS EDISON STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $13k → 11%BSA TROOP 77: $1k → 16%NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $16k → 16%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 6%UNIV OF VIRGINIA: $2k → 8%DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 6%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 22%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%UNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $5k → 16%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%THOMAS EDISON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 11%NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3k → 16%UNIV OF VIRGINIA: $1k → 8%DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 6%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 22%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%UNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $11k → 11%DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $3k → 6%UNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%ATLANTIC CAPE COMM COLL: $4k → 11%UNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $3k → 16%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%ATLANTIC CAPE COMM COLL: $4k → 11%RECOVERY FORCE: $2k → 11%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 11%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 11%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%ATLANTIC CHRISTIOAN SCHOOL: $1k → 11%HOLY SPIRIT HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 11%HOLY SPIRIT HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 11%ST JOSEPH REGIONAL SCHOOL: $5k → 11%HOPE FOR A BETTER FUTURE: $2k → 11%OUR LADY STAR SEA REG SCHOOL: $3k → 11%OUR LADY STAR SEA REG SCHOOL: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
VA
NC
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$257k · 23 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
9

Total granted

$257k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+43%

Still filing today

17%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DV
    DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $18k · revenue +14%
  • AC
    ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI
    4× · 2017–2020 · $13k · revenue +110%
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +43%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH REGIONAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • GM
    GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $58,329 · OtherSTOCKTON UNIVERSITYROWAN UNIVERSITY: $24,000 · OtherROWAN UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $20,000 · OtherUNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINANJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $18,500 · OtherNJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYDELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $17,500 · OtherDELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITYCLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYTHOMAS EDISON STATE UNIVERSITY: $9,005 · Other+22 more: $71,837 · Other+22 moreATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $12,731 · EducationATLANTIC …DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationDREXEL UN…
Other$254,171Education$22,731

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $12,731 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKnights of Columbus 9113 Resurrection Council: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Knights of Columbus 9113 Resurrection Council ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John C Allen Charitable TrustNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John C Allen Charitable Trust · Folds of Honor Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization JOHN STEELMAN and ELIZABETH STEELMAN Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from JOHN STEELMAN and ELIZABETH STEELMAN Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on JOHN STEELMAN and ELIZABETH STEELMAN’s filings →

    More from the funding graph