Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Mark Rudkin Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0159% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$119kArts & Culture$45kInternational$30kFood & Nutrition$11kHuman Services$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kHealth$2kReligion$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$812k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Essex County Greenbelt$10,000
Trustees of Reservation$4,500
Ipswich Watershed Assoc$2,500
Mass Audubon Society$2,500
Cape Ann Museum$2,500
Accord Food Pantry$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Beverly Bootstraps$1,000
Essex Mass Fire Dept$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Open Door$1,000
Hamilton MA Fire Dept$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Three Sisters: $2k → 8%Cape Ann Museum: $5k → 10%MASS AUDUBON SOCIETY: $8k → 12%MFA FUND: $1k → 16%Three Sisters: $1k → 8%Cape Ann Museum: $3k → 10%MASS AUDUBON SOCIETY: $5k → 12%Boston Childrens Hospital: $1k → 16%BYRD HOFFMAN WATERMILL FDN INC: $20k → 17%Gloucester Food Bank: $2k → 10%Mass Audubon Society: $3k → 12%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATION: $10k → 16%PAUL TAYLOR DANCE COMPANY: $10k → 17%Gloucester Food Bank: $2k → 10%Mass Audubon Society: $3k → 12%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATION: $6k → 16%BYRD HOFFMAN WATERMILL FDN INC: $1k → 17%Cape Ann Museum: $2k → 10%Mass Audubon Society: $3k → 12%Trustees ofReservation: $5k → 16%THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BELRAN: $30k → 17%Open Door: $1k → 10%Trustees ofReservation: $5k → 16%GLOUCESTER FOOD BANK: $1k → 10%Trustees of Reservation: $5k → 16%CAPE ANNE MUSEUM: $1k → 10%CAPE ANN MUSEUM: $1k → 10%ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOC: $10k → 10%Essex County Greenbelt: $10k → 10%Essex County Greenbelt Assoc: $8k → 10%ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOC: $5k → 10%Essex County Greenbelt: $3k → 10%Essex Police Dept: $2k → 10%ESSEX POLICE DEPT: $1k → 10%Essex Mass Fire Dept: $1k → 10%Beverly Bootstraps: $2k → 10%Beverly Bootstraps: $2k → 10%Accord Food Pantry: $2k → 10%Myopia Horse Show: $1k → 10%Addison Gallery: $10k → 10%Addison Gallery: $10k → 10%Addison Gallery: $8k → 10%ADDISON GALLERY: $3k → 10%ADDISON GALLERY: $2k → 10%Ipswich Watershed Assoc: $20k → 10%Ipswich Watershed Assoc: $7k → 10%Ipswich Watershed Assoc: $3k → 10%IPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$232k · 23 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
10

Total granted

$232k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+130%

Still filing today

35%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CulturePublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +148%
  • THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +29%
  • MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BELRAN
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • PT
    PAUL TAYLOR DANCE COMPANY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
2
New England Museum Association

New england museum association's mission is to connect a community engaged in learning, collaboration, and action to cultivate a better museum world.

—
3
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
6
Maine Maritime Museum

To connect people to the past, present, and future of Maine's waterways and their global reach.

Arts & Culture
7
Trustees of the Berkshire Museum

Bringing people together for experiences that spark creativity and innovative thinking by making inspiring educational connections among art, history, and natural science.

Arts & Culture
8
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
9
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
10
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
11
Penobscot Marine Museum

Penobscot marine museum inspires curiosity and fosters understanding about life and work on the maine coast to encourage stewardship of our communities and the sea.

Arts & Culture
12
Massachusetts Land Conservation Trust

Conservation and preservation of land.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Reservations; the most unlike its peers is Peabody Essex Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BELRAN: $30,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BELRANIpswich Watershed Assoc: $29,500 · OtherIpswich Watershed AssocPAUL TAYLOR DANCE COMPANY: $10,000 · OtherPAUL TAYLOR DANCE COMPANYIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherGloucester Food Bank: $5,000 · OtherAccord Food Pantry: $5,000 · Other+17 more: $25,100 · Other+17 moreESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $35,500 · EnvironmentESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATIONTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $30,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONSMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $20,500 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INCIPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $3,207 · EnvironmentBYRD HOFFMAN WATER MILL FOUNDATION: $21,000 · Arts & CultureBYRD HOFFMAN W…CAPE ANN MUSEUM INC: $11,150 · Arts & CultureCAPE ANN MUSEU…PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC: $3,000 · Arts & CulturePEABODY ESSEX …BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $5,000 · Community ImprovementChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,000 · HealthCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Public Benefit
Other$149,100Environment$89,207Arts & Culture$35,150Community Improvement$5,000Health$1,000Public Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $35,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBYRD HOFFMAN WATER MILL FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $20,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE ANN MUSEUM INC: $11,150 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $3,207 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds BYRD HOFFMAN WATER MILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ANN MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I ↗
  • Who funds IPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Mark Rudkin Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Mark Rudkin Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Ipswich River Watershed Association: 68% of income from government
  • Cape Ann Museum Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Essex County Greenbelt Association: 8% of income from government
  • Peabody Essex Museum Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John Mark Rudkin’s filings →

More from the funding graph