Skip to content

· Private foundation

John L Robowski 43q029019

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$37kHuman Services$18kMembership Benefit$9kFood & Nutrition$7kHousing & Shelter$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,335
Median grant
2
States reached
$259k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VITAS HEALTHCARE$4,997
COUNCIL ON AGING OF NW FLORIDA$1,335
BAPTIST HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$1,335
ST JOHNS CEMETERY FOUNDATION$1,335
COVENANT HOSPICE (HOSPICE OF NW FL)$1,335
Kimberly Tauer Foundation$600
MANNA FOOD BANK$300
LOAVES AND FISHES$300
WATERFRONT RESCUE MISSION$300
NEW HORIZONS OF NW FLORIDA$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ST JOHNS CEMETERY FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES: $300 → 13%VITAS HEALTHCARE: $5k → 13%COVENANT HOSPICE (HOSPICE OF NW FL): $4k → 16%ST JOHNS CEMETERY FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES: $300 → 13%Covenant Village Care Center: $2k → 13%COVENANT HOSPICE (HOSPICE OF NW FL): $4k → 16%ST JOHNS CEMETERY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%LOAVES AND FISHES: $300 → 13%COVENANT HOSPICE (HOSPICE OF NW FL): $4k → 16%LOAVES AND FISHES: $300 → 13%COVENANT HOSPICE (HOSPICE OF NW FL): $2k → 16%LOAVES AND FISHES: $300 → 13%EMERALD COAST HOSPICE: $2k → 16%LOAVES AND FISHES: $300 → 13%EMERALD COAST HOSPICE: $2k → 16%EMERALD COAST HOSPICE: $2k → 16%REGENCY HOSPICE: $2k → 16%COVENANT HOSPICE (HOSPICE OF NW FL): $2k → 16%REGENCY HOSPICE: $2k → 16%COVENANT HOSPICE (HOSPICE OF NW FL): $1k → 16%REGENCY HOSPICE: $2k → 16%Kimberly Tauer Foundation: $600 → 16%NEW HORIZONS OF NW FLORIDA: $300 → 16%NEW HORIZONS OF NW FLORIDA: $300 → 16%NEW HORIZONS OF NW FLORIDA: $300 → 16%NEW HORIZONS OF NW FLORIDA: $300 → 16%NEW HORIZONS OF NW FLORIDA: $300 → 16%NEW HORIZONS OF NW FLORIDA: $300 → 16%MANNA FOOD BANK: $3k → 16%MANNA FOOD BANK: $300 → 16%MANNA FOOD BANK: $300 → 16%MANNA FOOD BANK: $300 → 16%MANNA FOOD BANK: $300 → 16%MANNA FOOD BANK: $300 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$80k · 10 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$80k
$2k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BAPTIST HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +27%
  • MF
    MANNA FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +11%
  • WR
    WATERFRONT RESCUE MISSION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • CV
    Covenant Village Care Center
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COVENANT HOSPICE (HOSPICE OF NW FL): $17,277 · OtherCOVENANT HOSPICE (HOSPICE OF NW FL)COUNCIL ON AGING OF NW FLORIDA: $15,127 · OtherCOUNCIL ON AGING OF NW FLORIDAST JOHNS CEMETERY FOUNDATION: $8,879 · OtherST JOHNS CEMETERY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $6,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVITAS HEALTHCARE: $4,997 · OtherVITAS HEALTHCARE+4 more: $6,190 · Other+4 moreBAPTIST HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $15,127 · HealthBAPTIST HEALTH CARE…MANNA FOOD BANK INC: $4,800 · Food & NutritionWATERFRONT RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,800 · Housing & Shelter
Other$65,670Health$15,127Food & Nutrition$4,800Housing & Shelter$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAPTIST HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $15,127 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $4,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWATERFRONT RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES INC: $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAPTIST HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERFRONT RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The W J Noonan Charitable Trust 32q013016GA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The W J Noonan Charitable Trust 32q013016 · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John L Robowski 43q029019 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John L Robowski 43q029019. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Manna Food Bank Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John L Robowski 43q029019’s filings →

More from the funding graph