Skip to content

· Private foundation

John H & Martha Garner Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$685kHealth$157kYouth Development$121kHousing & Shelter$10kHuman Services$10kEmployment$3k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR$100,000
BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION$33,333
OUR HOSPICE HOUSE$25,000
TEMPLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
TEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OUR HOSPICE HOUSE: $25k → 14%OUR HOSPICE HOUSE: $25k → 14%OUR HOSPICE HOUSE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$877k · 8 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$877k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+38%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR
    8× · 2017–2025 · $600k · revenue +13%
  • BS
    BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION-MCLANE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k
  • OH
    OUR HOSPICE HOUSE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k

Funded once

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -42%
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS MATERNITY HOME INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -45%
  • BC
    BELTON CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education
4
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
5
East Texas Baptist University

East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…

Education
6
United Church of Christ Homes Inc

In the spirit of christ's love, the ministry of united church of christ homes is to provide care and service to elders through acts of love and compassion.

Human Services
7
Central Oklahoma United Methodist Retirement Facility Inc

To develop and provide premier, wellness-based campuses and community outreach.

Human Services
8
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
9
Mcmurry University

Shaped by christian principles, mcmurry university challenges students to examine our complex world from multiple perspectives in preparation for lives of leadership, service and professional success.

Education
10
Catholic Eldercare

Catholic eldercare provides a full continuum of care for seniors. our goal is to support each person throughout the remainder of their lives in a holistic way. we provide care in partnership with family, church and community in as least…

—
11
Mid-America Christian University Inc

Mid-america christian university prepares students through a wesleyan perspective to create, collaborate, and innovate to solve local and global problems for the glory of god through jesus christ and the good of society.

—
12
Trinity Bible College and Graduate School

Trinity bible college & graduate school (tbc) is committed to training and educating people with theological reflection and missional passion in order that people and communities everywhere will hear the good news of jesus and see his love…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concordia University Texas; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $600,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLORCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS: $50,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXASTEMPLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EducationBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION-MCLANE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CE…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF TEMPLE: $37,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE O…BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $33,333 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE …SALVATION ARMY: $15,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA LONGHORN COUNCIL: $9,500 · Other+3 more: $10,000 · OtherOUR HOSPICE HOUSE: $60,000 · Human ServicesTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $20,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthOUR LADY OF THE ANGELS MATERNITY HOME INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterELDREDS NURSERY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EmploymentYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 · Youth Development
Education$685,000Other$205,333Human Services$60,000Health$21,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Employment$2,500Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $600,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOUR HOSPICE HOUSE: $60,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEMPLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBELTON CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOSPICE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS MATERNITY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds BELTON CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ELDREDS NURSERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter FoundationPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John H & Martha Garner Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John H & Martha Garner Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John H & Martha Garner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph