Skip to content

· Private foundation

John H and Marjorie N Glasgow Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$148k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$409kHuman Services$114kReligion$77kEducation$69kHealth$55kYouth Development$33kPhilanthropy$21kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $128k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,263
Median grant
—
States reached
$852k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
SOFEA$10,000
OXFORDSHIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$9,949
ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS$8,000
NEASHAM GLASGOW FAMILY COMPANY LTD$6,753
ABINGDON ABBEY BUILDINGS TRUST$6,748
OXFORDSHIRE COMMUNITY AND VOLUNTARY ACTION$6,695
THE THOMAS GIFFORD TRUST$5,864
ROTARY CLUB OF WITNEY TRUST FUND$3,949
Individual grant recipient$3,437
NAI'S HOUSE$3,437
RED KITE FAMILY CENTRE$3,431
THE OXFORD PRESERVATION TRUST$3,431
CHARLBURY SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$3,431
YOUTH CHALLENGE OXFORDSHIRE$3,431
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 11% of grant dollars ($98k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 89% that went abroad ($779k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COCOA360 FUND: $5k → 22%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS INC: $5k → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS INC: $2k → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS INC: $1k → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS INC: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
SC
DC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 89% of all-years giving ($779k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$759k · 73 grants
Slovakia$20k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$610k · 17 repeat orgs$414k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +173% since the first grant, against +99% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
55

Total granted

$610k
$305k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+173%
+99%

Still filing today

24%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue +92%
  • AA
    Animal Assisted Happiness Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +173%
  • FH
    FAMILY HOUSE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $8k · revenue +309%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PETER IN EASTGATE PCC
    one grant, 2024 · $27k
  • ND
    NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

Our Mission is to inspire our communities to invest in health and scientific advances to improve the health of children and their families in Canada and around the world.

Human Services
2
The Awty International School

See Schedule OThe purpose of Awty International School (Awty) is to create an environment where students experience excellence every day to make their mark on the world alongside their community, in a spirit of curiosity, courage and…

—
3
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

—
4
Global Healing

Global Healing promotes health care reform in areas of the world where modern medical health care is not available. Global Healing aims for sustainable development of healthcare services, rather than short-term or emergency interventions.

International
5
Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International
6
St Rock Haiti Foundation Ltd

Motivated by the inherent worth of each individual and our great care for the people of Haiti, the Saint Rock Haiti Foundation works side by side with the people of Saint Rock and the surrounding rural communities to enhance their lives…

Health
7
The Fay School

See Schedule O. The Fay School ("the School") is a nonsectarian, not-for-profit, co-educational school in which children of diverse talents and backgrounds with strong academic abilities are offered a high-quality education in a secure,…

—
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Maternal Help Hope Fund

Maternal Health Foundation is dedicated to treatment and prevention of childbirth injuries by building sustainable capacity with local partners in Sub-Saharan Africa supporting world-renowned doctors, researchers and hospitals that treat…

Health
10
International Generosity Foundation Trust

International generosity foundation trust is a grantmaking organization that supports and makes distributions to charitable, religious, scientific, and educational causes, with a focus on making global giving easy.

Religion
11
St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd

St. Luke's Health Foundation is a not-for-profit organization established to develop philanthropic resources that support St. Luke's mission "To improve the health of people in the communities we serve." We're responsible for cultivating…

Health
12
St Paul's United Methodist Foundation of Houston

To provide financial support to St. Paul's United Methodist Church in Houston, TX.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Methodist Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Animal Assisted Happiness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DITCHLEY FOUNDATION: $370,071 · OtherDITCHLEY FOUNDATIONTHOMAS GIFFORD TRUST: $69,011 · OtherTHOMAS GIFFORD TRUST+89 more: $531,224 · Other+89 moreTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthFAMILY HOUSE INC: $7,520 · HealthJoanna Ruth Bell Foundation: $2,000 · HealthAnimal Assisted Happiness Inc: $9,000 · Human ServicesCOCOA360 FUND: $5,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CONNECT INC: $5,000 · InternationalGivers Legacy Foundation Inc: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$970,306Health$34,520Human Services$14,000International$5,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Assisted Happiness Inc: $9,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $7,520 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOCOA360 FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWORLD CONNECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGivers Legacy Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt John's School: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Animal Assisted Happiness Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John H and Marjorie N Glasgow Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John H and Marjorie N Glasgow Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John H and Marjorie N Glasgow’s filings →

    More from the funding graph