Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John E Trembly Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$235kArts & Culture$147kCommunity Improvement$51kEducation$48kHealth$38kEnvironment$36kCrime & Legal$25kPhilanthropy$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Council Grove Life Center$20,000
Council Grove Area Foundation$12,500
Morris County Care & Share$5,240
Symphony in the Flint Hills$5,000
Core Community Alta Vista$5,000
Trail Blazing Morris County$5,000
CASA of the 8th Judicial District$4,000
Council Grove Arts Council$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Morris County Historical Society$2,500
USD 417$2,500
Council Grove Area Trade & Tourism Washunga$2,000
Council Grove Community Theatre$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%Morris County Senior Citizens Center: $1k → 11%Morris County Senior Citizens Center: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of John E Trembly Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in KS; read by stated purpose it is 91% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

John E Trembly Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$542k · 40 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
40

Total granted

$542k
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+39%

Still filing today

15%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CG
    Council Grove Life Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +20%
  • GM
    GREATER MORRIS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +865%
  • MC
    Morris County Senior Citizens Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF COUNCIL GROVE RIVERWALK PARK COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • MC
    MORRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CG
    COUNCIL GROVE SANTA FE TRAIL 200 COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2019 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
3
Morton County Historical Society Inc

Preservation of historical records and artifacts of morton county, kansas

4
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

5
Tonganoxie Senior Citizens Donna Wiley
Housing & Shelter
6
Haskell County Historical Society Haskell County Historical Society

To restore and preserve historical structures and memorabilia

7
Kansas Insurance & Financial Services Education Foundation
Education
8
Community Enhancement Foundation of Plains

To combat economic and physical deterioration of Plains KS through charitable social welfare activities and economic development projects that encourage job development and population stability.

Education
9
Pittsburg Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote the Pittsburg, Kansas business community.

10
Holt county historical society

Holt co history

Arts & Culture
11
Morris County Economic Development Alliance
Community Improvement
12
Hayslope Preservation Historic Fund

Public charity

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morris County Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Casa of the Eighth Judicial District Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KANSAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY-KAW MISSIONLAST CHANCE STORE — $35,000 · OtherKANSAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY-KAW MISSIONLAST CHANCE STORECouncil Grove Riverwalk-CG Area Foundation — $30,000 · OtherCouncil Grove Riverwalk-CG Area FoundationCouncil Grove Public Library — $22,380 · OtherSymphony in the Flint Hills Inc — $21,000 · OtherCITY OF COUNCIL GROVE RIVERWALK PARK COMMITTEE — $20,000 · OtherGREATER MORRIS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $17,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE KAW HERTIAGE INC — $16,450 · Other+74 more — $287,581 · Other+74 moreCouncil Grove Life Center Inc — $155,010 · Recreation & SportsCouncil Grove Life Center…MORRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthCouncil Grove Area Foundation — $22,500 · PhilanthropyHISTORIC PRESERVATION CORPORATION — $2,500 · EducationMorris County Senior Citizens Inc — $1,750 · Human Services
Other$469,911Recreation & Sports$155,010Health$25,000Philanthropy$22,500Education$2,500Human Services$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCouncil Grove Life Center Inc — $155,010 over 9y, 13% of budgetMORRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCouncil Grove Area Foundation — $22,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSymphony in the Flint Hills Inc — $21,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER MORRIS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $20,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetCASA OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC — $11,750 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCouncil GroveMorris County Chamber of Commerce & Tourism — $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHISTORIC PRESERVATION CORPORATION — $2,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMorris County Senior Citizens Inc — $1,750 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Council Grove Life Center Inc
  • Who funds MORRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Council Grove Area Foundation
  • Who funds Symphony in the Flint Hills Inc
  • Who funds GREATER MORRIS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds CASA OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bill B Young FoundationKS26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bill B Young Foundation · Oscar & Ina Nystrom Foundation · Arthur M & Ethel L Hylton Trust · Council Grove Area Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John E Trembly Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John E Trembly Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John E Trembly Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph