Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John D Drew and Dorothy M Drew Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of JOHN D DREW AND DOROTHY M DREW FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$216k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,400
PROJECT AMIGO$1,800
ST PATRICK'S SCHOOL$1,500
LIFT$1,200
HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL$1,200
U OF W SAILING FOUNDATION ENDOWMENT$1,200
SANDIA PREP SCHOOL$1,200
SAFE PASSAGE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
43 NORTH IOWA$1,000
EMPOWER HOUSE$1,000
MAIN STREET MATTERS$1,000
NIACC FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MISSION OF MERCY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $700 → 9%LITTLE AL FOUNDATION: $200 → 10%MAIN STREET MATTERS: $1k → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $700 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $700 → 9%MAIN STREET MATTERS: $1k → 12%MAIN STREET MATTERS: $600 → 12%MAIN STREET MATTERS: $600 → 12%MISSION OF MERCY: $2k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $1k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $500 → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $400 → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $400 → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $400 → 17%MAIN STREET MATTERS: $300 → 12%MAIN STREET MATTERS: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
SD
IA
IN
CA
NE
MO
KY
NM
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of John D Drew and Dorothy M Drew Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

John D Drew and Dorothy M Drew Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$93k · 35 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
6

Total granted

$93k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-7%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    Project Amigo
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +28%
  • Safe Passage
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +101%
  • DM
    DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • CH
    Cathedral High School Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -29%
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY OF BLUFFS
    one grant, 2024 · $800
  • SP
    ST PAUL THE APOSTLE
    one grant, 2024 · $600

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
4
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

7
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
8
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Lighthouse for the Blind in New Orleans Inc

To empower people with disabilities through employment, services and advocacy.

Health
10
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
11
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Bank of Northwest Indiana Inc

To provide food to various charitable organizations and needy individuals in northwest indiana.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Iowa Transition and Employment Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Main Street Matters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Public University Foundatio…Animal Rescue and AdoptionChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Volunteer Fire DepartmentsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Christian Youth CampsCancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Food Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,535

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KEE HIGH SCHOOL — $5,550 · OtherKEE HIGH SCHOOLSANDIA PREP SCHOOL — $4,100 · OtherSANDIA PREP SCHOOLU OF W SAILING FOUNDATION ENDOWMENT — $3,400 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $3,350 · OtherEPIPHANY PARISH — $3,000 · OtherLOURDES HOME & SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $3,000 · OtherAMUNDSEN HIGH SCHOOL — $2,900 · OtherNORTH IOWA TRANSITION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC — $2,800 · OtherMEEHAN LIBRARY — $2,500 · OtherEmpower House — $3,100 · OtherOne Vision — $2,300 · Other+28 more — $29,400 · Other+28 moreMISSION OF MERCY INC — $4,200 · Human ServicesMISSION OF …MAIN STREET MATTERS INC — $3,950 · Human ServicesMAIN STREET…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $2,100 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYE…+1 more — $200 · Human ServicesHAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK — $3,300 · Food & NutritionHAWKEYE H…GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK — $2,800 · Food & NutritionGREATER L…COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK — $2,450 · Food & NutritionCOASTAL B…Project Amigo — $5,700 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $700 · Youth DevelopmentWOLCOTT SCHOOL — $2,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF BURLEY — $2,400 · EducationCathedral High School Foundation Inc — $1,000 · EducationSafe Passage — $4,600 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $300 · InternationalDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · Philanthropy
Other$65,400Human Services$10,450Food & Nutrition$8,550Youth Development$6,400Education$5,900International$4,900Philanthropy$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetProject Amigo — $5,700 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSafe Passage — $4,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC — $4,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET MATTERS INC — $3,950 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK — $3,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEmpower House — $3,100 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH IOWA TRANSITION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC — $2,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK — $2,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOLCOTT SCHOOL — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK — $2,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BURLEY — $2,400 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOne Vision — $2,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C — $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFT INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL LEISURE SERVICES FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC — $1,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCathedral High School Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SHALOM INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLANSING FIRE DEPARTMENT — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE AL FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Project Amigo
  • Who funds Safe Passage
  • Who funds DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC
  • Who funds MAIN STREET MATTERS INC
  • Who funds HAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Empower House
  • Who funds NORTH IOWA TRANSITION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC
  • Who funds GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK
  • Who funds WOLCOTT SCHOOL
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BURLEY
  • Who funds One Vision
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C
  • Who funds LIFT INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL LEISURE SERVICES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds Cathedral High School Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore Foundation · Behmann Brothers Foundation · Ed Rachal Foundation · Coastal Bend Community Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John D Drew and Dorothy M Drew Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John D Drew and Dorothy M Drew Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John D Drew and Dorothy M Drew Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph