Skip to content

· Private foundation

John D & Jane Leifheit Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$160kPublic Safety & Disaster$73kHuman Services$53kEducation$44kReligion$24kAnimals$8kArts & Culture$6kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $54k
$3,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,796
EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY$10,796
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$10,796
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,796
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,796
HINCKLEY BIG-ROCK COMMUNITY HIGH SC$7,500
HINCKLEY FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
HINCKLEY COMMUNITY FIRE PROTECTION$5,000
HINCKLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY$3,500
DEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,500
HINCKLEY AREA FOOD PANTRY$1,500
HINCKLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,500
TAILS HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
DEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE$1,000
SOMONAUK UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $12k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $12k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $11k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $9k → 14%HINCKLEY AREA FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 13%HINCKLEY AREA FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 13%HINCKLEY AREA FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$378k
$0

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $53k · revenue +33%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2021–2025 · $53k · revenue +27%
  • DC
    DEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +158%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Dane County Humane Society

    Our mission is to foster compassionate human and animal connections; forge safe, healthy, and thriving communities for animals; provide care and transitional sheltering to animals; provide leadership and guidance to the animal sheltering…

    Animals
    2
    Dekalb Humane Society Inc

    The organization provides a safe shelter for animals until they can be adopted into a lifelong home. the organization supports local law enforcement departments in animal abuse and neglect cases, works with animal rescue groups and…

    Animals
    3
    Michigan Humane Society

    To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

    Animals
    4
    American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Inc

    Driven by a vision to end cancer as we know it for everyone, the american cancer society cancer action network, inc. (acs can) advocates for evidence-based public policies to reduce the cancer burden by engaging advocates across the…

    Health
    5
    Humane Society of Southern Arizona

    To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

    Animals
    6
    Animal Humane Society

    Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

    Animals
    7
    Dickinson County Humane Society

    Provide shelter and adoption services for abandoned and lost animals and to educate the public in the areas of pet care and responsibility

    Animals
    8
    Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

    Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

    Health
    9
    Connecticut Humane Society

    The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

    Animals
    10
    Wisconsin Humane Society

    The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

    Animals
    11
    Asheville Humane Society Inc

    Asheville humane society is building a supportive community that posivitely impacts pets and people.

    Animals
    12
    Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha County Inc

    The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.

    Animals
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dekalb County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/10
    Grantees still filing
    6/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE SALVATION ARMY: $53,235 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYHINCKLEY BIG-ROCK COMMUNITY HIGH SC: $30,000 · OtherHINCKLEY BIG-ROCK COMMUNITY HIGH SCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $23,596 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYHINCKLEY FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherHINCKLEY FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHINCKLEY COMMUNITY FIRE PROTECTION: $20,000 · OtherHINCKLEY COMMUNITY FIRE PROTECTIONHINCKLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $14,000 · OtherHINCKLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY+2 more: $6,000 · OtherAmerican Heart Association Inc: $53,235 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $53,235 · HealthEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REG…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $29,639 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $53,235 · Human ServicesAmerican National…HINCKLEY AREA FOOD PANTRY: $6,000 · Human ServicesHINCKLEY AREA FOO…DEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC: $4,000 · AnimalsTAILS HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,000 · AnimalsHINCKLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,000 · Arts & CultureDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $2,000 · Youth Development
    Other$166,831Health$136,109Human Services$59,235Animals$8,000Arts & Culture$6,000Philanthropy$6,000Youth Development$2,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $53,235 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $53,235 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $53,235 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $29,639 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHINCKLEY AREA FOOD PANTRY: $6,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTAILS HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
    • Who funds EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
    • Who funds HINCKLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds HINCKLEY AREA FOOD PANTRY ↗
    • Who funds DEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds DEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC ↗
    • Who funds TAILS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Dekalb County Community FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Dekalb County Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization John D & Jane Leifheit Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John D & Jane Leifheit Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on John D & Jane Leifheit’s filings →

      More from the funding graph