How much did JOHN CHANY RESIDUARY CL UW grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of JOHN CHANY RESIDUARY CL UW’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

homelessparishsaintboston

2022

homelessboston

2023

homelessbostonshelter

2024

boston

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k16 grants · $46k
$10k–50k2 grants · $20k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$1.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC$10,000
SAINT COLUMBKILLE PARTNERSHIP$10,000
WINTER WALK$5,000
CORPORATIO FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING$5,000
CRISTO REY BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL INC$5,000
PINE STREET INN INC$2,500
BREAKTIME CAFE INC$2,500
HALEY HOUSE INC$2,500
ROAD TO THE RIGHT TRACK$2,500
VOLUNTEER VENTURES MA INC$2,500
WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE$2,500
CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION$2,500
CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF ST PAUL$2,500
HEARTH INC$2,500
ST TERESA OF CALCUTTA PARISH$2,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 48% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$227k · 19 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$227k

$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%

+134%

Still filing today

58%

14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +34%
PINE STREET INN INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $18k · revenue +90%
CH
CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION
3× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +229%

Funded once

PS
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LIST
one grant, 2020 · $60k
SC
SAINT COLUMBKILLE PARTNERSHIP SCHOOL
one grant, 2021 · $10k
BH
BOSTON HIGH SCHOOL
one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Boston Home Inc

To improve the lives of adults with advanced multiple sclerosis and other neurological disorders.

Health

Pine Street Inn Housing Ii Inc

Pine street inn housing ii, inc. is a massachusetts not-for-profit corporation, which was organized to provide ten elderly individuals with housing facilities and services at the inn's menino house at geneva avenue in boston,…

Housing & Shelter

South Boston Neighborhood House Inc

To support family and neighborhood life in south boston.

Human Services

Harvard Square Churches Meal Program Inc

The Harvard Square Churches Meal Program prepares and serves a weekly evening meal every Thursday for 100+ underserved and un housed people in the Cambridge / Greater Boston area.

Food & Nutrition

Lowell Area Housing Inc

—

Family Promise North Shore Boston Inc

Family promise north shore boston has three primary programs of homelessness prevention/shelter diversion, general programs, and housing stabilization. as a privately funded organization, we have the flexibility to assist families in…

Human Services

House of Hope Inc

To provide emergency shelter for homeless women and children, including food and case management educational opportunities.

Housing & Shelter

HomeStart Inc

To end homelessness in Greater Boston by assisting individuals in obtaining permanent housing.

Community Improvement

Historic Boston Incorporated

—

Boston Neighborhood Support Fka Howard

Housing & Shelter

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

Project Do Something Boston Inc

Provide goods to homeless persons in Boston. This includes food, clothing, seasonal weather gear. Support homeless persons transition into housing with home goods not provided by other services. Provide emergency shelter during winter…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Familyaid Boston Inc and the most unlike its peers is Third Sector New England Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

14/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$202,000Community Improvement$40,000Human Services$38,500Youth Development$17,500Employment$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Arts & Culture$7,500Education$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Champions of Love Foundation IncMA28.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Champions of Love Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Adelard and Valeda Roy Foundation · Yawkey Foundation II · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Needham Bank Charitable · Riley Mabel Louise Tr Uwill · Boston Charitable Trust Fund · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall · Cambridge Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOHN CHANY RESIDUARY CL UW funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HARVARD SQUARE HOMELESS SHELTER CORP.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 043399927 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HARVARD SQUARE HOMELESS SHELTER CORP, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John Chany Residuary Cl Uw?

Find your warmest path to John Chany Residuary Cl Uw through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOHN CHANY RESIDUARY CL UW

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John Chany Residuary Cl Uw?

More from the funding graph

JOHN CHANY RESIDUARY CL UW

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John Chany Residuary Cl Uw?

More from the funding graph