Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Susan Landon Alford Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$74kHealth$61kFood & Nutrition$54kCrime & Legal$29kRecreation & Sports$23kArts & Culture$22kEducation$19kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$620k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB$8,000
HENDERSON CIVIC CENTER$8,000
HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY$5,000
ONE STEP AT A TIME INC$2,520
WINDRIDGE THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CT$2,500
MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS$2,000
HENDERSON FOOD BANK PALS$2,000
RUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
RUSK-PANOLA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CEN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS: $2k → 12%WILEY COLLEGE: $1k → 16%RUSK COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE RUSK COUNTY LIBRARY: $2k → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF EAST: $2k → 12%RUSK COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%BOY SCOUTS EAST TX COUNCIL: $500 → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF EAST: $2k → 12%RUSK COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%BOY SCOUTS EAST TX COUNCIL: $500 → 17%MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS: $2k → 12%BOY SCOUTS EAST TX COUNCIL: $500 → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF EAST: $2k → 12%SON SHINE LIGHTHOUSE TRANSITIONAL W: $2k → 17%MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS: $2k → 12%SON SHINE LIGHTHOUSE TRANSITIONAL W: $2k → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF EAST: $2k → 12%RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $10k → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF EAST: $2k → 12%RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $8k → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF EAST: $2k → 12%RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $8k → 17%BOY SCOUTS EAST TX COUNCIL: $500 → 12%RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $8k → 17%BOY SCOUTS EAST TX COUNCIL: $500 → 12%RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $8k → 17%BOY SCOUTS EAST TX COUNCIL: $500 → 12%RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $8k → 17%BOY SCOUTS EAST TX COUNCIL: $500 → 12%RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $8k → 17%RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $8k → 17%RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $4k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 17%RUSK SOIL WATER CONSERVATION: $800 → 17%RUSK SOIL WATER CONSERVATION: $800 → 17%RUSK SOIL WATER CONSERVATION: $800 → 17%RUSK SOIL WATER CONSERVATION: $800 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$309k · 20 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$309k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-5%

Still filing today

15%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB
    9× · 2017–2025 · $70k
  • HI
    HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k
  • KH
    KEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFULCTY OF HEND
    6× · 2017–2023 · $29k

Funded once

  • HC
    Henderson Civic Theatre Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -5%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE RUSK COUNTY LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • ST
    STARBRITE THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CE
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUB: $70,176 · OtherRUSK COUNTY BOYS GIRLS CLUBKEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFULCTY OF HEND: $29,085 · OtherKEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFULCTY OF HENDWINDRIDGE THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CT: $21,500 · OtherWINDRIDGE THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CTONE STEP AT A TIME: $20,671 · OtherONE STEP AT A TIMEHENDERSON FOOD BANK PALS: $18,000 · OtherHENDERSON FOOD BANK PALSRUSK COUNTY UNITED WAY: $14,886 · OtherRUSK COUNTY UNITED WAYRUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING: $14,000 · OtherRUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPINGHENDERSON CIVIC CENTER INC: $14,000 · OtherHENDERSON CIVIC CENTER INCFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $8,500 · OtherRUSK-PANOLA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CEN: $8,500 · Other+9 more: $31,700 · Other+9 moreHENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY: $33,000 · Food & NutritionHENDERSON I…HENDERSON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · EducationWiley College: $1,000 · EducationMOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS OF EAST TEXAS INC: $12,000 · HealthHenderson Civic Theatre Inc: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$251,018Food & Nutrition$33,000Education$17,000Health$12,000Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY: $33,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetHENDERSON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetMOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS OF EAST TEXAS INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWiley College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds HENDERSON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Henderson Civic Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wiley College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bess L Rayford FoundationTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bess L Rayford Foundation · Henderson Memorial Hospital Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Susan Landon Alford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Susan Landon Alford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John & Susan Landon Alford Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John & Susan Landon Alford Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Susan Landon Alford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph