Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Roene Klusch Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$87kRecreation & Sports$52kFood & Nutrition$41kPhilanthropy$27kHealth$5kEnvironment$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$791k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Akron Canton Regional Food Bank$10,000
Alliance Community Pantry$5,000
University of Mount Union$5,000
Aviators Sports Boosters$3,500
Ben Curtis Foundation$3,000
Alliance Academic Recognition Dinner$2,945
University of Akron$2,000
Alliance High School$1,900
University of Toledo$1,327
Walsh University$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
St Leo University$1,000
Ohio University$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Alliance Community Pantry: $15k → 13%Alliance Community Pantry: $10k → 13%Vantage Aging: $1k → 13%Alliance Community Pantry: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 14 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$176k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+11%

Still filing today

36%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AVIATOR SPORTS BOOSTERS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +837% · 81% of their budget
  • AC
    ALLIANCE COMMUNITY PANTRY INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +13% · 25% of their budget
  • UO
    University of Mount Union
    7× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • AC
    Alliance City Schools
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • AC
    Alliance Community Soccer Club
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Ohio Athletic Conference

An athletic conference of 10 universities and colleges in oh. the conferences responsibility is to oversee all inter-collegiate athletic events; including tournaments, playoff assignments to officials. maintain a proper balance between…

Recreation & Sports
3
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
4
Akron Community Foundation

To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…

Philanthropy
5
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
8
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
9
Allen University

Allen University is an academic community which provides students an opportunity to obtain baccalaureate and graduate degrees in liberal arts and professional programs in traditional and distance education formats. The University has a…

Education
10
Ohio Bankers League

Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.

Community Improvement
11
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
12
Alfred University

Alfred University's mission is helping students realize their purpose. People living a life of purpose enjoy longer and happier lives. Alfred University promotes its mission through three core strengths - Intersections, Mentorship, and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance Family Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aviator Sports Boosters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AVIATOR SPORTS BOOSTERS INC: $33,349 · OtherAVIATOR SPORTS BOOSTERS INCIndividual grant recipient: $31,648 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAlliance City Schools: $25,000 · OtherAlliance City SchoolsAlliance High School: $13,900 · OtherAlliance High SchoolUniversity of Akron: $11,000 · OtherUniversity of AkronBen Curtis Foundation: $9,000 · OtherBen Curtis FoundationAlliance Academic Boosters: $8,850 · OtherAlliance Academic BoostersIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · Other+11 more: $23,945 · Other+11 moreALLIANCE COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE COMM…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesUniversity of Mount Union: $19,500 · EducationUniversity o…Walsh University Inc: $6,000 · EducationWalsh Univer…LAKE ERIE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationLAKE ERIE CO…+1 more: $500 · EducationGREATER ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · PhilanthropyAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionAlliance Family Health Center Inc: $5,000 · HealthTHE WILDERNESS CENTER INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$163,692Human Services$31,000Education$28,000Philanthropy$18,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Health$5,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAVIATOR SPORTS BOOSTERS INC: $33,349 over 8y, 81% of budgetALLIANCE COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $19,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance Family Health Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE ERIE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STARK & WAYNE COUNTIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVANTAGE AGING: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJohn Carroll University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AVIATOR SPORTS BOOSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE COMMUNITY PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alliance Family Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF STARK & WAYNE COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds VANTAGE AGING ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds John Carroll University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Roene Klusch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Roene Klusch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John & Roene Klusch Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John & Roene Klusch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Roene Klusch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph