Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Orlena Marsh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$88kHuman Services$69kYouth Development$51kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kPhilanthropy$33kReligion$22kRecreation & Sports$16kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,273
Median grant
5
States reached
$668k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION$9,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS$5,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$5,000
PROJECT LEAD THE WAY INC$5,000
BIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS$5,000
YMCA$4,273
OHIO GUIDESTONE$2,500
OHIO DISTRICT KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC$2,500
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$2,500
BENEATH THE SHADE$2,500
TUSCARAWAS CO CHURCH & COMMUNITY$2,000
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY LITERACY COALITION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
IA
IN
OH
KY
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$332k · 17 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$332k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+12%

Still filing today

24%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +29%
  • TP
    TUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +11%
  • TC
    TUSCARAWAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    3× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • RI
    RTY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • BC
    BUCKEYE CAREER CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • TL
    THE LOVING HEART FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Tuscarawas County Inc

The mission of the united way of tuscarawascounty inc is to invest in local programs and services thateffectively improve the lives of tuscarawas county residents.

Philanthropy
2
Greater Dover-New Philadelphia Food Pantry

Providing food assistance

Food & Nutrition
3
Tuscarawas County Committee On Aging

To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs

Human Services
4
Together Helping Others Inc

Backpacks for the street provides basic nutritional and hygeine goods directly to homeless individuals. additionally, each person is offered information about other services.

Human Services
5
Brown Bag of Columbus Inc

Food for the elderly and needy

—
6
Buckeye Trail Association Inc

The buckeye trail association builds, maintains, preserves, and promotes the use of the 1400 + mile buckeye trail, ohio's longest hiking trail, for our citizens, communities and partners. since 1959, we have provided outdoor recreation,…

Recreation & Sports
7
Topeka Rescue Mission Inc

The topeka rescue mission is dedicated to helping the homeless and hungry by providing emergency shelter to approximately 2,000 men, women and children and serving over 400,000 meals annually. trm provides a christian social service…

Housing & Shelter
8
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
9
Village Food Pantry Inc

To provide food assistance and support services to individuals and families experiencing food insecurity in Butler County Ohio.

Human Services
10
Temporary Shelter Inc

The mission of Temporary Shelter, Inc. is to operate an emergency homeless shelter within the City of Tustin, California.

Housing & Shelter
11
Topss

The mission of TOPSS is to alleviate hunger, provide nutrition information, and provide services to promote self-sufficiency to the families and individuals in need within the Talawanda School District in Southwestern Ohio.

Food & Nutrition
12
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is OhioGuidestone; the most unlike its peers is Perry Township Search and Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDOVER-PHILA FOOD PANTRY: $40,000 · OtherDOVER-PHILA FOOD PANTRYT-4-C YOUTH BOOSTER PROGRAM: $37,500 · OtherT-4-C YOUTH BOOSTER PROGRAMTUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA: $35,000 · OtherTUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCAUNITED WAY OF TUSCARAWAS: $25,222 · OtherUNITED WAY OF TUSCARAWASAMERICAN RED CROSS: $21,206 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSSALVATION ARMY OF DOVER: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,561 · OtherPROJECT LEAD THE WAY: $12,000 · Other+27 more: $99,706 · Other+27 moreBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS…TUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsTUSCARAWAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 · AnimalsBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC: $3,924 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $7,500 · PhilanthropyPROJECT LEAD THE WAY INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$340,195Human Services$35,000Recreation & Sports$12,000Animals$10,000Youth Development$8,924Philanthropy$7,500Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTUSCARAWAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT LEAD THE WAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOVING HEART FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetCAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC: $3,924 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetDENISON VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTwin City Christian Center Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetOHIO DISTRICT KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOhioGuidestone: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Homeless Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetPerry Township Search and Rescue Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds TUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUSCARAWAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF NEW PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LEAD THE WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVING HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DENISON VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Twin City Christian Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds OHIO DISTRICT KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OhioGuidestone ↗
  • Who funds Beneath The Shade ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Homeless Inc ↗
  • Who funds Perry Township Search and Rescue Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blair E & Anna L Zimmerman Foundation TrustOH20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blair E & Anna L Zimmerman Foundation Trust · Dewey H & Irene G Moomaw Foundation Trust · Haman Family Foundation Oag #98-1135 · Reeves Foundation · Doris & Floyd Kimble Foundation · Dover Exchange Club Childrens Foundation · Tuscarawas County Community Foundat · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Orlena Marsh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Orlena Marsh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Orlena Marsh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph