How much did JOHN AND MARY RAINSFORD CHARITABLE grant in FY2018?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of JOHN AND MARY RAINSFORD CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2018 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

WILLIE K CHARITY GOLF TOURNAMENT$2,500
COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$2,000
ALPHA CHARTER GUILD TO THE ANTELOPE VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$1,500
SAN DIEGUITO HERITAGE MUSEUM$1,000
THOUSAND SMILES FOUNDATION$1,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,000
ENCINITAS ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$35k · 4 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +163% since the first grant, against +77% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$35k

$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+163%

+77%

Still filing today

50%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WK
WILLIE K CHARITY GOLF TOURNAMENT
2× · 2017–2018 · $23k
SD
SAN DIEGUITO HERITAGE MUSEUM
2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue -27%
ER
ENCINITAS ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION
2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +163%

Funded once

HO
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEYS
one grant, 2017 · $8k
AC
ALPHA CHARTER GUILD
one grant, 2017 · $8k
NC
NORTH COUNTY LIFELINEgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ventura County Family Justice

To assist in creating a safe place for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, and elder abuse to access medical and mental health assistance, as well as law enforcement.

—

Central Coast Pregnancy Center

To support, help and encourage all women facing a pregnancy with concerns and also to teach our youth the risks of sexual activity outside of marriage.

Health

Community Resource Center

Human Services

Contra Costa Community Outreach

Provide free wellness health screening and laboratory services to uninsured, underserved and socioeconomically disadvantaged population within the community

Health

Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web

The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…

Health

Safe Harbor Coronado

To provide prevention and Intervention services that improve the emotional and behavioral health of youth and their families in Coronado.

Health

Alameda County Family Justice Center Inc

The purpose of this corporation is to provide comprehensive, collaborative,professional services to victims of domestic violence and their children, to victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault and sexual exploitation, to victims of elder…

Human Services

Children's Safety Center

Child abuse victim assistance

Crime & Legal

Central Coast Overdose Prevention

CCODP aims to eliminate overdoses and other negative substance-related outcomes in the Tri-County communities and beyond by increasing awareness, reducing stigma, educating the public, improving access to community support services and…

Health

Centro Cultural De Mexico

Centro Cultural de Mexico is an alternative space in Santa Ana where the community can find cultural, educational, and artistic activities.

Arts & Culture

The Family Resource Center

Support services victims of rape and sexual abuse

—

Ancla de Esperanza

Help needy and vulnerable youth

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assistance League of North Coast and the most unlike its peers is Community Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/9

Grantees still filing

8/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$47,500Human Services$9,000Philanthropy$3,800Arts & Culture$2,500Health$1,500International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOHN AND MARY RAINSFORD CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ALPHA CHARTER GUILD TO THE ANTELOPE VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 237089049 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ALPHA CHARTER GUILD TO THE ANTELOPE VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John and Mary Rainsford Charitable?

Find your warmest path to John and Mary Rainsford Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOHN AND MARY RAINSFORD CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John and Mary Rainsford Charitable?

More from the funding graph

JOHN AND MARY RAINSFORD CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John and Mary Rainsford Charitable?

More from the funding graph