· Private foundation
John and Janet Kornreich Charitable Foundation Ltd
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $158k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $552k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUNRISE ASSOCIATION | $140,855 |
| FRIENDS OF KAREN | $104,500 |
| ISLAND HARVEST | $100,500 |
| LITERACY NASSAU | $90,000 |
| BOOK FAIRIES | $60,000 |
| NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE | $56,165 |
| MORGAN CENTER | $35,000 |
| LONG ISLAND CHILDRENS MUSEUM | $35,000 |
| FAIRY GODMOTHER FDN OF NY | $23,000 |
| DANCING DREAMS | $15,000 |
| JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR RIGHTEOUS | $15,000 |
| VISCARDI CENTER | $14,065 |
| DISABILITY EMPOWER NETWORK | $11,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $10,000 |
| CAMP GOOD MOURNING | $9,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LNLITERACY NASSAU INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +46% · 33% of their budget
- IHISLAND HARVEST LTD8× · 2017–2025 · $785k · revenue +110%
- FOFRIENDS OF KAREN INC8× · 2017–2025 · $588k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- LFLEXIBEAN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $48k
- HMHOLOCAUST MUSEUM & TOLERANCE CENTERone grant, 2020 · $47k
- MRMOTIVATIONAL RECOVERY ENVIRONMENTS INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The friedberg jewish community center promotes jewish life and values by providing programs and services in a warm and caring environment for all people in every stage of life. we build a community one member at a time.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Northwell health cancer institute is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…
The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…
Helping families with sick children.
Wipe out kids cancer offers comfort and hope to kids with cancer through support programs serving the entire family and funds innovative research leading to new discoveries and treatments in the fight against pediatric cancer. "support and…
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…
The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Karen Inc and the most unlike its peers is Philadelphia Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LITERACY NASSAU INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KAREN INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE VISCARDI CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BOOK FAIRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE MORGAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds LEXIEBEAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DANCING DREAMS ↗
- Who funds FAIRY GODMOTHER FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF OLD WESTBURY INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP GOOD MOURNING INC ↗
- Who funds BELIEVE IN A CURE INC ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY EMPOWHER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MOTIVATIONAL RECOVERY ENVIRONMENTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bahnik Foundation Inc · New York Community Bank Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Peter & Jeri Dejana Foundation · The Marilyn Lichtman Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Imagine Awards Inc · Manhasset Community Fund Inc · Frank J Antun Foundation · Sunshine Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John and Janet Kornreich Charitable Foundation Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Miami Children's Museum Inc Fka Miami Youth Museum — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.