Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Elizabeth Alltucker Charitable Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$233k
Granted FY2018
7
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$33k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of John and Elizabeth Alltucker Charitable Foundation’s FY2019 grant dollars went to The Oregon Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year John and Elizabeth Alltucker Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $233k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’18
0
’19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2019.

Philanthropy$4.4MEducation$100kHuman Services$100k
02FY2018 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$33,259
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EUGENE FAMILY YMCA$33,259
EUGENE ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUST$33,259
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$33,259
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$33,259
THE YMCA IN VISALIA$33,259
THE RELIEF NURSERY$33,259
LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$33,259
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $33k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,358,592 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $33,259 · PhilanthropyLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $33,259 · OtherTHE YMCA IN VISALIA: $33,259 · OtherRELIEF NURSERY INC: $33,259 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $33,259 · EducationOregon State University Foundation: $33,259 · EducationYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE: $33,259 · Human Services
Philanthropy$4,391,851Other$99,777Education$66,518Human Services$33,259

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,358,592 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $33,259 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $33,259 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRELIEF NURSERY INC: $33,259 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE: $33,259 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Elizabeth Alltucker Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Elizabeth Alltucker Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Relief Nursery Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Elizabeth Alltucker’s filings →

More from the funding graph