Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

John a Thomann Memorial Foundation

The john a.

$118k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$375kEducation$120kCrime & Legal$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kFood & Nutrition$15kEmployment$10kHuman Services$5kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $115,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $118,400 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,400 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$136k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUDSON RESOURCE CENTER$20,000
PAOC AUTISM SERVICES$20,000
STEVEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWER$20,000
END SEPSIS (SHARE)$20,000
SHARE CANCER SUPPORT$15,000
HELMET TO HARDHATS$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HUDSON RESOURCE CENTER: $20k → 14%PAOC AUTISM SERVICES: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 73% of John a Thomann Memorial Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 82% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 24% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

John a Thomann Memorial Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$400k · 4 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$400k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    6× · 2018–2024 · $280k · revenue +70%
  • MF
    MAVERICK FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2023 · $50k · revenue -49%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +392%

Funded once

  • AT
    ANSWER THE CALL
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • NB
    NYC BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION SAFETY FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Altruism for New York Foundationinc
Civil Rights
2
Northwell Health Cancer Institute Inc

Northwell health cancer institute is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
3
The Don Monti Memorial Research Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission - establish and maintain funding for research, education, fellowship and patient care relating to cancer.

4
American-Italian Cancer Foundation

To support cancer research, education and early detection, (cont. on schedule o)emphasizing the unique resources of italy & usa, recognizing world-class scientific excellence in medicine.

Health
5
Get Your Rack Back Inc

The mission of get your rack back inc. is to provide support, kindness, and needed items to cancer patients and their families in the capital region of new york.

Health
6
Schenectady Firefighter Cancer Foundatio

The mission of the schenectady firefighter cancer foundation is to provide the schenectady fire department members and their families with an opportunity to receive assistance when dealing with cancer. they strive to provide comfort,…

Health
7
Foundation for Research of the New York Academy of Osteopathy Inc
8
The Paul Robert Carey Foundation

Enabling people battling cancer and other diseases to obtain vital quality of life needs and services not funded by traditional medical reimbursements.

Philanthropy
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
11
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
12
Long Island 2 Day Walk to Figh Breast Cancer Inc

Li2day was organized to raise awareness and funds for the breast cancer and other cancer research, to benefit cancer sufferers,

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York City Police Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Answer the Call. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $280,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC — $35,000 · HealthSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INCTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATIONMAVERICK FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationMAVERICK FOUNDATI…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TU…ANSWER THE CALL — $25,000 · Crime & LegalNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Crime & LegalPARENTS OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN POAC AUTISM SERVICES — $20,000 · Human ServicesCANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesDEBRA C PARMENTOLA FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Community ImprovementNYC BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION SAFETY FUND — $20,000 · OtherST MATTHEWS YOUNG WIDOWS — $5,000 · OtherNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC — $10,000 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER NYC — $5,000 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI FOOD PANTRY — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$335,000Education$90,000Crime & Legal$45,000Human Services$40,000Community Improvement$30,000Other$40,000Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $280,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAVERICK FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDEBRA C PARMENTOLA FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetPARENTS OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN POAC AUTISM SERVICES — $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI FOOD PANTRY — $15,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NYC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John a Thomann Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph