Skip to content

· Private foundation

John a Jurenko Et Al Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$210k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$223kScience & Tech$200kHealth$146kEducation$128kPhilanthropy$97kHuman Services$39kEnvironment$28kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,800
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA$10,000
UNITED WAY OF MADISON COUNTY$10,000
HUNTSVILLE MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA$10,000
KIDS TO LOVE$10,000
WELLSTONE INC$7,500
HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
HUNTSVILLE LEARNING CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE & TENNESSEE VALLEY INC$4,000
ALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION$3,000
HUNTSVILLE BOTANICAL GARDENS$2,800
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA - CAPSTONE COMMUNICATION SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIDS TO LOVE: $10k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE: $5k → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $5k → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $3k → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $3k → 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $3k → 11%FIRST STOP INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of John a Jurenko Et Al Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 74%.

John a Jurenko Et Al Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$854k · 29 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -75% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
4

Total granted

$854k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-75%

Still filing today

52%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    United Way of Madison County Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +12%
  • MB
    MUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +43%
  • UC
    UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE AND TENNESSEE VALLEY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • GL
    GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • FS
    First Stop Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -75%
  • MV
    MADISON VISIONARY PARTNERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +122%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
2
University Charter School

Operation of a public charter school in Livingston, AL.

Education
3
United Way of West Alabama Inc

The mission of united way of west alabama is to promote the general welfare of the citizens of west alabama by: raising funds, on an annual basis, to assist the effective delivery of health and human care programs and services, allocating…

Philanthropy
4
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
5
Hollins University Corporation

Hollins university is an independent liberal arts university dedicated to academic excellence and humane values. hollins university offers undergraduate liberal arts education for women, selected graduate programs for men and women, and…

Education
6
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
7
Medaille University

Medaille university concentrates on excellence in teaching, with an emphasis on personal attention to its diverse student body. its curriculum provides a solid liberal arts and sciences foundation with early access to career-oriented…

—
8
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
9
Andrews University

Education

Education
10
United Way of Hamblen County Inc

Voluntary health & welfare

Philanthropy
11
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

—
12
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Samford University; the most unlike its peers is Waterfront Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $117,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE AND TENNESSEE VALLEY: $36,000 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE AND T…HUNTSVILLE BOTANICAL GARDENS: $18,300 · OtherHUNTSVILLE BOTANICAL GARDENSLINCOLN VILLAGE PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $15,000 · Other+13 more: $100,500 · Other+13 moreHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATIONSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · EducationSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITYKAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Education+2 more: $12,000 · EducationMUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE: $90,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM BOARD…HUNTSVILLE YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHUNTSVILLE Y…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC: $45,000 · HealthTHE HUNTSVIL…WELLSTONE INC: $27,500 · HealthWELLSTONE IN…ALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION: $27,000 · HealthALPHA OMICRO…United Way of Madison County Inc: $96,500 · PhilanthropyUnited Way o…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesVILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $14,000 · Human ServicesFirst Stop Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$331,800Education$234,000Arts & Culture$101,000Health$99,500Philanthropy$97,500Human Services$30,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUnited Way of Madison County Inc: $96,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE: $90,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE AND TENNESSEE VALLEY: $36,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN VILLAGE PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $14,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTSVILLE YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetWATERFRONT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $9,000 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetKAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSamford University: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFirst Stop Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON VISIONARY PARTNERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALABAMA CONSTITUTION VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Madison County Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE AND TENNESSEE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds WELLSTONE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA OMICRON PI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN VILLAGE PRESERVATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSVILLE YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERFRONT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds KAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds First Stop Inc ↗
  • Who funds MADISON VISIONARY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA CONSTITUTION VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL32.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Jane K Lowe Charitable Foundation · The Beard-Young Family Foundation · Wallace E Kirkpatrick Family Foundation · Alpha Foundation · The Propst Foundation · Parker Griffith Family Foundation · Community Bank Partners · Lanier Family Foundation · The I3 Cares Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John a Jurenko Et Al Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John a Jurenko Et Al Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John a Jurenko Et Al’s filings →

    More from the funding graph