· Private foundation
Johanna Anderson Trueblood Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $262k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORONADO SAFE | $25,000 |
| STEPHEN J WAMPLER FOUNDATION | $21,000 |
| YOLO COUNTY CASA | $20,000 |
| REALITY CHANGERS | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Savannah Classical Academy | $20,000 |
| RADYS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL AUXILIARY | $20,000 |
| UNION MISSION | $20,000 |
| San Diego City Fdn | $20,000 |
| San Diego Rescue Mission | $20,000 |
| SAVANNAH PHILHARMONIC | $20,000 |
| CHANCES FOR CHILDREN NY | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,000 |
| LEWIS AND CLARK COLLEGE | $6,000 |
| PROJECT HOPE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YCYolo Crisis Nursery3× · 2021–2023 · $167k · revenue +187%
- SHSAFE HARBOR CORONADO3× · 2021–2024 · $69k · revenue +32%
- UTUNITED THROUGH READING3× · 2021–2023 · $60k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- FHFred Hutchinson Cancer Centerone grant, 2023 · $153k · revenue +9%
- SYSTANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS dba STANFORD SIERRA YOUTH & FAMILIESone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +23%
- GIGIRLS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +87%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.
The mission of the united way of santa cruz county is to ignite our community to give, advocate and volunteer so that our youth succeed in school and in life, our residents are healthy and our families are financially independent.our most…
The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.
To inspire, educate, and empower "opportunity youth", to achieve academic success through music education, sound engineering, and multimedia production.
To partner with youth, families, adults and communities to reach their full potential and is achieved through comprehensive and integrated programming in the areas of child and youth development; youth, adult and family wellness and…
Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…
Scad prepares talented students for creative professions through engaged teaching and learning in a positively oriented university environment.
Founded in 1887, the center is the oldest children's nonprofit in the region accredited by the joint commission for its excellence in quality of care. the center provides a continuum of therapeutic & educational services to youth &…
Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…
Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is PROMISES2KIDS Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wheel to Walk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Yolo Crisis Nursery ↗
- Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR CORONADO ↗
- Who funds UNITED THROUGH READING ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
- Who funds TELFAIR MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds DEEP CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Stephen J Wampler Foundation Camp WAMP ↗
- Who funds SAVANNAH MUSIC FESTIVALINC ↗
- Who funds THE SAVANNAH CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS dba STANFORD SIERRA YOUTH & FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds THE MATTHEW REARDON CENTER FOR AUTISM INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds SAVANNAH PHILHARMONIC CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHANCES FOR CHILDREN - NY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRONX IS BLOOMING ↗
- Who funds HARLEM GROWN INC ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Savannah Community Foundation Inc · The Hodge Foundation Inc · United Way of the Coastal Empire · John G Kennedy Foundation Inc · Colonial Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · The Adler Family Foundation Inc · The Savannah Benevolent Association · Dianne & Thomas Lookabaugh Foundation · Courtney Knight Gaines Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Johanna Anderson Trueblood Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lewis & Clark College — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Johanna Anderson Trueblood Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Johanna Anderson Trueblood Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.