Skip to content
Jog Family Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Jog Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$96kEducation$39kPhilanthropy$21kRecreation & Sports$20kHealth$3kHuman Services$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$120Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $16k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$725
Median grant
2
States reached
$60k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$9,471
VARIOUS LOCAL CHARITIES UNDER 1000$4,144
CONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR$725
CONG KAHAL OHR HACHAIM$610
YESHIVAS OHR YEHUDA$360
KOLEL MATEH EFRAIM$250
KOLEL SHOMRE HACHOMOS OF JERUSALEM$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $850 → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $360 → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $180 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 23 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
24

Total granted

$227k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
0%

Still filing today

39%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionPhilanthropyInternationalRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YESHIVA OHR YEHUDA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +217%
  • YO
    YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +45%
  • YO
    YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • LI
    LONG ISLAND FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIO
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
3
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
4
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
5
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
6
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
7
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
8
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
9
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
10
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
11
Kollel Ohr Hatorah Inc

To expand torah education

Religion
12
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Kollel Nachlas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $50,320 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIOUS LOCAL CHARITIES UNDER 1000: $24,961 · OtherVARIOUS LOCAL CHARITIES UNDER 1000CONG KAHAL OHR HACHAIM: $23,525 · OtherCONG KAHAL OHR HACHAIMIndividual grant recipient: $18,971 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLONG ISLAND FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIO: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,900 · OtherBNOS DEVORAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $8,250 · Other+25 more: $62,154 · Other+25 moreYESHIVA OHR YEHUDA INC: $19,700 · EducationYESHIVA OHR YEH…YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $11,460 · EducationYESHIVA ORCHOS …YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $4,110 · EducationYESHIVAS OHR HA…BNOS ESTHER MALKA INC: $3,596 · EducationBNOS ESTHER MAL…MESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC: $1,650 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL NACHLAS: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsRABBI MEIR BAAL HANESS SHAREI TZION INC: $2,286 · ReligionMIKVAH USA INC: $500 · ReligionALEPH BEIS GIMMEL INC: $500 · ReligionROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,953 · PhilanthropyCHAYIM ARUCHIM INC: $1,390 · Human ServicesKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $700 · InternationalBOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH: $120 · Health
Other$243,081Education$41,516Recreation & Sports$20,000Religion$3,286Philanthropy$2,953Human Services$1,390International$700Health$120

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL NACHLAS: $20,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetYESHIVA OHR YEHUDA INC: $19,700 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $11,460 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $4,110 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBNOS ESTHER MALKA INC: $3,596 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,953 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRABBI MEIR BAAL HANESS SHAREI TZION INC: $2,286 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC: $1,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAYIM ARUCHIM INC: $1,390 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMosdos Yaakov Vyisroel: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEPH BEIS GIMMEL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL NACHLAS ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OHR YEHUDA INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds TASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS ESTHER MALKA INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds RABBI MEIR BAAL HANESS SHAREI TZION INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAYIM ARUCHIM INC ↗
  • Who funds Mosdos Yaakov Vyisroel ↗
  • Who funds Kolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundRegina Goldwasser Fou…Donors Fund IncJewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…National Society for …Jsp Family FoundationYarim FoundationNitzavim TrustSheena FoundationYeshiva Shagas Aryeh …The Jonathan & Esther…
The Ojc FundNY28× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jsp Family Foundation · Yarim Foundation · Nitzavim Trust · Sheena Foundation · Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc · The Jonathan & Esther B Rosenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jog Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jog Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Mesivta Ohr Yisroel Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Tashbar of Lakewood Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jog Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home