Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Joe's Wish

(see schedule o)to provide emergency relief funds for employees of blanchard machinery company, to support local sc charities that assist people in need of food or shelter, and to provide merit-based scholarships to the children of blanchard machinery company employees who meet eligibility and selection criteria.

$378k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $139,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $378,339 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $239,339 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$19,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$253k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$30,000
LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK$20,000
SAFE HARBOR$20,000
CENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$19,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
CHAPIN WECARE$10,000
TOBY'S PLACE$10,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
2
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc

To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
5
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc

To provide food assistance through a network of partners, while educating and engaging our communities in the elimination of hunger and its causes.

Food & Nutrition
6
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

7
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
8
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

9
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

10
All Faiths Food Bank Inc

Together with our partners, we provide healthy solutions to end hunger in our community.

Food & Nutrition
11
Harry Chapin Food Bank of Southwest Florida Inc

The mission is to lead our community in the fight against hunger. the vision is that no one has to go hungry in our community.

Food & Nutrition
12
Interfaith Social Services Inc

To provide south shore residents with the resources necessary to support a healthy and fulfilling life. our team delivers programs focused on alleviating hunger, providing mental health counseling, preventing homelessness, and bringing joy…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harvest Hope Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is The Toby Cassels Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INCCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $19,000 · OtherCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITYSAFE HARBOR INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross …HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $30,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANKSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSECHAPIN WE CARE CENTER — $10,000 · ReligionCHAPIN WE CARE CENTE…THE TOBY CASSELS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$39,000Human Services$35,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Religion$25,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $19,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOBY CASSELS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHAPIN WE CARE CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Joe's Wish funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph