Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joe D Pentecost Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$2.2MHealth$2.0MHousing & Shelter$1.2MEducation$1.2MHuman Services$1.0MScience & Tech$338kEnvironment$232kFood & Nutrition$159kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $394k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $643k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MID MICHIGAN RECOVERY SERVICES INC$200,000
WAI-IAM INC$178,000
LANSING PROMISE$115,000
MSU BRESLIN AND CHAMPIONS EDGE$100,000
THE DAVIES PROJECT FOR MID MICHIGAN CHILDREN$50,000
AITCH FOUNDATION$45,000
THE HOUSE OF PROMISE$40,000
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC$30,000
CHILD & FAMILY CHARITIES$25,000
ENDEAVOR HOUSE MINISTRIES$20,000
WOLDUMAR NATURE ASSOCIATION$20,000
MID-MICHIGAN TENNIS ASSOCIATION$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING$15,000
MID MICHIGAN TREATMENT COUTS$15,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY -EMPOWERHER$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $420k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CRISTO REY COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 9%CRISTO REY COMMUNITY CENTER: $12k → 9%CRISTO REY COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 9%CHILD & FAMILY CHARITIES: $25k → 16%CHILD AND FAMILY CHARITIES: $60k → 16%CHILD AND FAMILY CHARITIES: $50k → 16%CHILD & FAMILY CHARITIES: $26k → 16%CHILD AND FAMILY CHARITIES: $21k → 16%CHILD AND FAMILY CHARITIES: $20k → 16%CHILD AND FAMILY CHARITIES: $11k → 16%CHILD AND FAMILY CHARITIES: $10k → 16%CHILD AND FAMILY CHARITIES: $10k → 16%SMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 16%SMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 16%THE DAVIES PROJECT FOR MID MICHIGAN CHILDREN: $50k → 16%THE DAVIES PROJECT FOR MID MICHIGAN CHILDREN: $50k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $10k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
MI
MA
IN
OH
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 66 repeat orgs$605k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

66 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
13

Total granted

$8.6M
$409k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+16%

Still filing today

47%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $196k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MID-MICHIGAN RECOVERY SERVICES INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $627k · revenue +69%
  • LP
    Lansing Promise
    9× · 2017–2025 · $515k · revenue +373%
  • I5
    IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $338k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOLY CROSS WOMEN'S BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • LC
    LANSING COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $65k
  • W
    WKAR
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
2
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
3
Association for Children's Mental Health

To ensure all michigan children and youth with emotional, behavioral, or mental health challenges and their families live in a safe, welcoming community with access to needed services and supports.

Health
4
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
5
Ingham Health Plan Corporation

To act as a vehicle to provide access to organized systems of health care and improve the health status of individuals in the community.

Health
6
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
7
Michigan's Children

To ensure that policymakers prioritize the needs of the most challenged children from cradle to career.

Human Services
8
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
9
Child Care Resource and Referral of Kalamazoo

To work with parents, child care providers, businesses and the community to improve access to quality child care and early education so that every child enjoys safe, nurturing and inspiring care.

Human Services
10
Ozone House Inc

Ozone house provides holistic support and housing services that enhance the well-being and safety of young people through empowerment, advocacy, and connection.

Human Services
11
Montessori Childrens House of Lenawee Inc

Education of young people in the Montessori method

Human Services
12
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ele's Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reading Is Fundamental Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/42
Grantees still filing
27/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAI-IAM RISE HOUSE: $1,141,698 · OtherWAI-IAM RISE HOUSEMID-MICHIGAN RECOVERY SERVICES INC: $626,813 · OtherMID-MICHIGAN RECOVERY SERVICES INCTHE AITCH FOUNDATION: $430,000 · OtherTHE AITCH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $296,611 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLY CROSS WOMEN'S BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $250,000 · OtherDAVIES PROJECT: $175,000 · Other+61 more: $2,249,713 · Other+61 moreBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $1,554,560 · Youth DevelopmentBurr Oak 4-H Club - Mi…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING: $137,300 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF…ELE'S PLACE INC: $66,000 · Youth Development+5 more: $63,250 · Youth DevelopmentThe House of Promise: $330,000 · Human ServicesThe House…Child and Family Charities: $233,000 · Human ServicesChild and…THE DAVIES PROJECT FOR MID MICHIGAN CHILDREN: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE DAVIE…Catholic Charities of Ingham Eaton & Clinton Counties: $42,000 · Human ServicesCatholic …Allen Neighborhood Center: $34,500 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesLansing Promise: $515,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationWAI-IAM INC: $356,000 · Crime & LegalCASA THE VOICE FOR CLINTON COUNTYS CHILDREN: $40,000 · Crime & LegalIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER: $337,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC: $21,120 · Arts & CultureLANSING ART GALLERY & EDUCATION CENTER: $15,000 · Arts & CultureLANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $27,500 · Housing & ShelterHAVEN HOUSE: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,169,835Youth Development$1,821,110Human Services$749,500Education$520,000Crime & Legal$396,000Arts & Culture$388,620Housing & Shelter$127,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMID-MICHIGAN RECOVERY SERVICES INC: $626,813 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetLansing Promise: $515,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetTHE AITCH FOUNDATION: $430,000 over 9y, 50% of budgetWAI-IAM INC: $356,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER: $337,500 over 9y, 5.4% of budgetThe House of Promise: $330,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetChild and Family Charities: $233,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING: $137,300 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $105,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DAVIES PROJECT FOR MID MICHIGAN CHILDREN: $100,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHIGHFIELDS INC: $76,899 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCapital Area United Way Inc: $76,800 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetJoe's Kids Inc: $67,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $66,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCatholic Charities of Ingham Eaton & Clinton Counties: $42,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCASA THE VOICE FOR CLINTON COUNTYS CHILDREN: $40,000 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetENDEAVOR HOUSE MINISTRIES: $40,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetPREGNANCY SERVICES OF GREATER LANSING: $39,000 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetWOLDUMAR NATURE ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAllen Neighborhood Center: $34,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetR J SCHEFFEL MEMORIAL TOY PROJECT INC: $29,600 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetMICHIGAN DYSLEXIA INSTITUTE INC: $28,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $27,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetUNITED MENTORING PROGRAM INC: $26,750 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC: $21,120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetITEC - LANSING: $20,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetBuilding Twenty One: $15,500 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLANSING ART GALLERY & EDUCATION CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetLANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSt Vincent Catholic Charities: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTODD MARTIN DEVELOPMENT FUND: $13,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCAPITAL AREA DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION: $11,032 over 2y, 10% of budgetELI'S PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetSMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 330 DANIEL WEBSTER COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPunks with Lunch Lansing: $4,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
  • Who funds MID-MICHIGAN RECOVERY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Lansing Promise ↗
  • Who funds THE AITCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WAI-IAM INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The House of Promise ↗
  • Who funds Child and Family Charities ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVIES PROJECT FOR MID MICHIGAN CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHFIELDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Capital Area United Way Inc ↗
  • Who funds Joe's Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Ingham Eaton & Clinton Counties ↗
  • Who funds CASA THE VOICE FOR CLINTON COUNTYS CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Capital Region Community FoundationMI55.2× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Capital Region Community Foundation · Lansing Economic Area Partnership · Lansing Rotary Foundation · Re Olds Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Dart Foundation fka Solid Waste Management Foundation · Jackson Charitable Foundation Inc · Desk Drawer Fund · United Way of South Central Michigan · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Louis Berkowitz Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joe D Pentecost Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joe D Pentecost Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joe D Pentecost Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Joe D Pentecost Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joe D Pentecost’s filings →

    More from the funding graph